Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35779099›Full record

SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2022

Requirement of preoperative blood typing for cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a systematic review.

Michael G Fadel, Ishaan Patel, Lawrence O'Leary, Nebil Behar, James Brewer

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The carbon footprint of group and save in elective and emergency surgery.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael G FadelDepartment of General Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK. m.fadel@imperial.ac.uk.
Ishaan PatelDepartment of General Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
Lawrence O'LearyDepartment of General Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
Nebil BeharDepartment of General Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
James BrewerDepartment of General Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBlood typing, or group and save (G&S) testing, is commonly performed prior to cholecystectomy and appendectomy in many hospitals. In order to determine whether G&S testing is required prior to these procedures, we set out to evaluate the relevant literature and associated rates of perioperative blood transfusion.

methodsStudies from January 1990 to June 2021 assessing the requirement of preoperative G&S testing for elective or emergency cholecystectomy and appendectomy were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. The search was performed on 6th July 2021 (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021267967). Number of patients, co-morbidities, operation performed, number of patients that underwent preoperative G&S testing, perioperative transfusion rates and financial costs were extracted.

resultsWe initially screened 194 studies of which 15 retrospective studies, a total of 477,437 patients, specifically met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies reported on cholecystectomy, two studies on appendectomy and three studies included both procedures. Where reported, a total of 177,539/469,342 (37.8%) patients underwent preoperative G&S testing with a perioperative transfusion rate of 2.1% (range 0.0 to 2.1%). The main preoperative risk factors associated with perioperative blood transfusion identified include cardiovascular co-morbidity, coagulopathy, anaemia and haematological malignancy. All 15 studies concluded that routine G&S is not warranted.

conclusionThe current evidence suggests that G&S is not necessarily required for all patients undergoing cholecystectomy or appendectomy. Having a targeted G&S approach would reduce delays in elective and emergency lists, reduce the burden on the blood transfusion service and have financial implications.

Indexed as

AppendectomyBlood Grouping and CrossmatchingBlood TransfusionCholecystectomyHumansRetrospective StudiesAppendectomyBlood transfusionBlood typingCholecystectomyGroup and save testingType and screen

Identifiers

PMID35779099
PMCPMC9468044
OpenAlexW4283785740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.