ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2022
3D printing for orbital volume anatomical measurement.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research and application discussion of cranial bone model preparation method based on three-dimensional reconstruction and 3D printing technology.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2024Article
- From pixels to precision: Imaging technologies shaping oculofacial plastic surgery practice.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
- Volumetric Assessment of Blow-Out Fractures With Automated Segmentation Benefits Thinner Computed Tomography Slice Thickness: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.The Journal of craniofacial surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim was to develop a method for reproducible orbital volume (OV) measurement in vivo based on 3D printing.
methodsTwelve orbits were obtained from dry skulls of the Human Anatomy Department of Lille University. Computer tomography (CT) slice images of these orbits were transformed into stereo-lithography (STL) format and 3D-printed. Bone openings were closed using either putty and cellophane after printing (3D-Orb-1) or at the printing stage in silico using MeshMixer (3D-Orb-2). The results were compared with those of the conventional water-filling method as a control group (Anat-Orb).
resultsThe observers reported a mean orbital volume of 21.3 ± 2.1 cm
conclusionOur 3D-printing method provides a standardized and reproducible method for the measurement of orbital volume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35779076What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.