ArticleESC heart failure2022
Sensitivity of ventricular systolic function to afterload during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Left ventricular unloading to facilitate ventricular remodelling in heart failure: A narrative review of mechanical circulatory support.Experimental physiology · 2024Review
- Head-to-toe bedside ultrasound for adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Intensive care medicine · 2024Review
- Sensitivity of ventricular systolic function to afterload during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsVeno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) increases afterload to the injured heart and may hinder myocardial recovery. We aimed to compare the sensitivity of left ventricular (LV) systolic function to the afterload effects of peripheral V-A ECMO during the acute and delayed stages of acute myocardial dysfunction. METHODS AND
resultsA total of 46 adult patients who were supported by peripheral V-A ECMO between April 2019 and June 2021 were analysed. Serial cardiac performance parameters were measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) on mean day 1 ± 1 of V-A ECMO initiation (n = 45, 'acute phase') and mean day 4 ± 2 of V-A ECMO initiation (n = 36, 'delayed phase'). Measurements were obtained at 100%, 120%, and 50% of ECMO target blood flow (TBF). LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) significantly improved from -6.1 (-8.9 to -4.0)% during 120% TBF to -8.8 (-11.5 to -6.0)% during 50% TBF (P < 0.001). The sensitivity of LV GLS to changes in ECMO flow was significantly greater in the acute phase of myocardial injury compared with the delayed phase [median (IQR) percentage change: 72.7 (26.8-100.0)% vs. 22.5 (14.9-43.8)%, P < 0.001]. Findings from other echocardiographic parameters including LV ejection fraction [43.0 (29.1-56.8)% vs. 22.8 (9.2-42.2)%, P = 0.012] and LV outflow tract velocity-time integral [45.8 (18.6-58.7)% vs. 24.2 (12.6-34.0)%, P = 0.001] were similar. A total of 24 (52.2%) patients were weaned off ECMO successfully.
conclusionsWe demonstrated that LV systolic function was significantly more sensitive to the afterload effects of V-A ECMO during the acute stage of myocardial dysfunction compared with the delayed phase. Understanding the evolution of the heart-ECMO interaction over the course of acute myocardial dysfunction informs the clinical utility of echocardiographic assessment in patients on V-A ECMO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.