Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35778842›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2022

Exploring CRD mobility during RAS/RAF engagement at the membrane.

Kien Nguyen, Cesar A López, Chris Neale, Que N Van, Timothy S Carpenter, Francesco Di Natale, Timothy Travers, Timothy H Tran, Albert H Chan, Harsh Bhatia and 20 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An in vitro BRAF activation assay elucidates molecular mechanisms driving disassembly of the autoinhibited BRAF state.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Generating Protein Structures for Pathway Discovery Using Deep Learning.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Reconstitution and characterization of BRAF in complex with 14-3-3 and KRAS4B on nanodiscs.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Biophysics of cancer.Biophysical journal · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kien NguyenTheoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.
Cesar A LópezTheoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.
Chris NealeTheoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.
Que N VanNational Cancer Institute RAS Initiative, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland.
Timothy S CarpenterPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California.
Francesco Di NataleApplications, Simulations, and Quality, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California.
Timothy TraversPebble Labs Inc., Los Alamos, New Mexico.
Timothy H TranNational Cancer Institute RAS Initiative, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland.
Albert H ChanNational Cancer Institute RAS Initiative, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland.
Harsh BhatiaCenter for Applied Scientific Computing, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California.
Peter H FrankNational Cancer Institute RAS Initiative, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland.
Marco TonelliNational Magnetic Resonance Facility at Madison, Biochemistry Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Xiaohua ZhangPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California.
Gulcin GultenNational Cancer Institute RAS Initiative, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland.
Tyler ReddyCCS-7, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.
Violetta BurnsTheoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.
Tomas OppelstrupPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California.
Nick HengartnerTheoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.
Dhirendra K SimanshuNational Cancer Institute RAS Initiative, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland.
Peer-Timo BremerCenter for Applied Scientific Computing, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California.
De ChenNational Cancer Institute RAS Initiative, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland.
James N GlosliPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California.
Rebika ShresthaNational Cancer Institute RAS Initiative, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland.
Thomas TurbyvilleNational Cancer Institute RAS Initiative, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland.
Frederick H StreitzPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California.
Dwight V NissleyNational Cancer Institute RAS Initiative, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland.
Helgi I IngólfssonPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California.
Andrew G StephenNational Cancer Institute RAS Initiative, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland.
Felice C LightstonePhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California.
Sandrasegaram GnanakaranTheoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico. Electronic address: GNANA@lanl.gov.
Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USLawrence Livermore National Laboratory · USLos Alamos National Laboratory · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

TR&D 3: TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT FOR NMR STUDIES OF SMALL MOLECULES (METABOLOMICS, NATURAL PRODUCTS, METABOLITE-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS) pp.537-585 P41GM103399 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BUTCHER, SAMUEL E · 2012 to 2019
$9.4M
NMR User Program at NMRFAMR24GM141526 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Katherine Anne Henzler-Wildman · 2021 to 2026
$6.4M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103399NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM141526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, the RAS-binding domain (RBD) and cysteine-rich domain (CRD) of RAF bind to active RAS at the plasma membrane. The orientation of RAS at the membrane may be critical for formation of the RAS-RBDCRD complex and subsequent signaling. To explore how RAS membrane orientation relates to the protein dynamics within the RAS-RBDCRD complex, we perform multiscale coarse-grained and all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of KRAS4b bound to the RBD and CRD domains of RAF-1, both in solution and anchored to a model plasma membrane. Solution MD simulations describe dynamic KRAS4b-CRD conformations, suggesting that the CRD has sufficient flexibility in this environment to substantially change its binding interface with KRAS4b. In contrast, when the ternary complex is anchored to the membrane, the mobility of the CRD relative to KRAS4b is restricted, resulting in fewer distinct KRAS4b-CRD conformations. These simulations implicate membrane orientations of the ternary complex that are consistent with NMR measurements. While a crystal structure-like conformation is observed in both solution and membrane simulations, a particular intermolecular rearrangement of the ternary complex is observed only when it is anchored to the membrane. This configuration emerges when the CRD hydrophobic loops are inserted into the membrane and helices α3-5 of KRAS4b are solvent exposed. This membrane-specific configuration is stabilized by KRAS4b-CRD contacts that are not observed in the crystal structure. These results suggest modulatory interplay between the CRD and plasma membrane that correlate with RAS/RAF complex structure and dynamics, and potentially influence subsequent steps in the activation of MAPK signaling.

Indexed as

CysteineProto-Oncogene Proteins c-rafBinding SitesCell MembraneMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesProtein BindingProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)SolventsCysteineMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Solvents

Identifiers

PMID35778842
PMCPMC9617161
OpenAlexW4283756867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.