Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35778838›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2022

POTATO: Automated pipeline for batch analysis of optical tweezers data.

Stefan Buck, Lukas Pekarek, Neva Caliskan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefan BuckHelmholtz Institute for RNA-based Infection Research (HIRI), Würzburg, Germany.
Lukas PekarekHelmholtz Institute for RNA-based Infection Research (HIRI), Würzburg, Germany.
Neva CaliskanHelmholtz Institute for RNA-based Infection Research (HIRI), Würzburg, Germany; Medical Faculty, Julius-Maximilians University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. Electronic address: neva.caliskan@helmholtz-hiri.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical tweezers are a single-molecule technique that allows probing of intra- and intermolecular interactions that govern complex biological processes involving molecular motors, protein-nucleic acid interactions, and protein/RNA folding. Recent developments in instrumentation eased and accelerated optical tweezers data acquisition, but analysis of the data remains challenging. Here, to enable high-throughput data analysis, we developed an automated python-based analysis pipeline called POTATO (practical optical tweezers analysis tool). POTATO automatically processes the high-frequency raw data generated by force-ramp experiments and identifies (un)folding events using predefined parameters. After segmentation of the force-distance trajectories at the identified (un)folding events, sections of the curve can be fitted independently to a worm-like chain and freely jointed chain models, and the work applied on the molecule can be calculated by numerical integration. Furthermore, the tool allows plotting of constant force data and fitting of the Gaussian distance distribution over time. All these features are wrapped in a user-friendly graphical interface, which allows researchers without programming knowledge to perform sophisticated data analysis.

Indexed as

Optical TweezersSolanum tuberosumNanotechnologyProtein FoldingRNARNA

Identifiers

PMID35778838
PMCPMC9388390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.