ArticleBMC health services research2022
Challenges to implementing artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative interview study with healthcare leaders in Sweden.
Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 166 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
166 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 387 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in genitourinary oncology: publication trends and systematic review.BJU international · 2026Pooled it
- Adoption of artificial intelligence in primary health care: systematic synthesis of stakeholder perspectives.BMC primary care · 2026Pooled it
- The Comprehensive Evidence on the Effectiveness and Experiences of Mentoring Programmes for Managers in Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.Journal of nursing management · 2026Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) in Africa: a systematic review using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR).Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Platform Architecture for Hospital Systems: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in rehabilitation: a living systematic mapping review - first release.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning for personalized risk assessment of HIV, syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2025Pooled it
- AI in Medical Questionnaires: Scoping ReviewJournal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Models for Pediatric Lung Sound Analysis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- AI for IMPACTS Framework for Evaluating the Long-Term Real-World Impacts of AI-Powered Clinician Tools: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Implementation of Machine Learning Applications in Health Care Organizations: Systematic Review of Empirical Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Health Care Professionals' Experience of Using AI: Systematic Review With Narrative Synthesis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Malnutrition: A Systematic Literature Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Pooled it
- Rewiring care delivery through Digital Therapeutics (DTx): a machine learning-enhanced assessment and development (M-LEAD) framework.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Digital Competence among Healthcare Leaders: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.Journal of nursing management · 2024Pooled it
- Nursing Perceptions of the Intended Use of Artificial Intelligence to Prevent Medication Errors: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Perspectives of Patients Regarding Artificial Intelligence and Its Application in Healthcare: A Qualitative Study.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- The use of artificial intelligence in assessing fever in the returning traveller: A scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- A Survey on Perspectives Toward Artificial Intelligence Among Italian Interventional Cardiologists.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond Bedside Implementation: Why Procurement and Vendor Management Matter for Sustainable AI.Nursing & health sciences · 2026Article
106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) for healthcare presents potential solutions to some of the challenges faced by health systems around the world. However, it is well established in implementation and innovation research that novel technologies are often resisted by healthcare leaders, which contributes to their slow and variable uptake. Although research on various stakeholders' perspectives on AI implementation has been undertaken, very few studies have investigated leaders' perspectives on the issue of AI implementation in healthcare. It is essential to understand the perspectives of healthcare leaders, because they have a key role in the implementation process of new technologies in healthcare. The aim of this study was to explore challenges perceived by leaders in a regional Swedish healthcare setting concerning the implementation of AI in healthcare.
methodsThe study takes an explorative qualitative approach. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted from October 2020 to May 2021 with 26 healthcare leaders. The analysis was performed using qualitative content analysis, with an inductive approach.
resultsThe analysis yielded three categories, representing three types of challenge perceived to be linked with the implementation of AI in healthcare: 1) Conditions external to the healthcare system; 2) Capacity for strategic change management; 3) Transformation of healthcare professions and healthcare practice.
conclusionsIn conclusion, healthcare leaders highlighted several implementation challenges in relation to AI within and beyond the healthcare system in general and their organisations in particular. The challenges comprised conditions external to the healthcare system, internal capacity for strategic change management, along with transformation of healthcare professions and healthcare practice. The results point to the need to develop implementation strategies across healthcare organisations to address challenges to AI-specific capacity building. Laws and policies are needed to regulate the design and execution of effective AI implementation strategies. There is a need to invest time and resources in implementation processes, with collaboration across healthcare, county councils, and industry partnerships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.