Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35778683›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Practical application of a Bayesian network approach to poultry epigenetics and stress.

Emiliano A Videla Rodriguez, Fábio Pértille, Carlos Guerrero-Bosagna, John B O Mitchell, Per Jensen, V Anne Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emiliano A Videla RodriguezSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9TH, UK.
Fábio PértilleEnvironmental Toxicology Program, Institute of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Carlos Guerrero-BosagnaEnvironmental Toxicology Program, Institute of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
John B O MitchellEaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9ST, UK.
Per JensenAVIAN Behavioural Genomics and Physiology Group, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
V Anne SmithSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9TH, UK. vas1@st-andrews.ac.uk.
University of St Andrews · GBLinköping University · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2016/20440-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo,Brazil 2018/13600-0Horizon 2020 Framework Programme Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 812777Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2018-01074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelationships among genetic or epigenetic features can be explored by learning probabilistic networks and unravelling the dependencies among a set of given genetic/epigenetic features. Bayesian networks (BNs) consist of nodes that represent the variables and arcs that represent the probabilistic relationships between the variables. However, practical guidance on how to make choices among the wide array of possibilities in Bayesian network analysis is limited. Our study aimed to apply a BN approach, while clearly laying out our analysis choices as an example for future researchers, in order to provide further insights into the relationships among epigenetic features and a stressful condition in chickens (Gallus gallus).

resultsChickens raised under control conditions (n = 22) and chickens exposed to a social isolation protocol (n = 24) were used to identify differentially methylated regions (DMRs). A total of 60 DMRs were selected by a threshold, after bioinformatic pre-processing and analysis. The treatment was included as a binary variable (control = 0; stress = 1). Thereafter, a BN approach was applied: initially, a pre-filtering test was used for identifying pairs of features that must not be included in the process of learning the structure of the network; then, the average probability values for each arc of being part of the network were calculated; and finally, the arcs that were part of the consensus network were selected. The structure of the BN consisted of 47 out of 61 features (60 DMRs and the stressful condition), displaying 43 functional relationships. The stress condition was connected to two DMRs, one of them playing a role in tight and adhesive intracellular junctions in organs such as ovary, intestine, and brain.

conclusionsWe clearly explain our steps in making each analysis choice, from discrete BN models to final generation of a consensus network from multiple model averaging searches. The epigenetic BN unravelled functional relationships among the DMRs, as well as epigenetic features in close association with the stressful condition the chickens were exposed to. The DMRs interacting with the stress condition could be further explored in future studies as possible biomarkers of stress in poultry species.

Indexed as

ChickensPoultryAnimalsBayes TheoremEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleBayesian networksDifferential methylationEpigeneticsPoultryStress

Identifiers

PMID35778683
PMCPMC9250184
OpenAlexW4283777356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.