Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35778604›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2023

Segmentation of macular neovascularization and leakage in fluorescein angiography images in neovascular age-related macular degeneration using deep learning.

David Holomcik, Philipp Seeböck, Bianca S Gerendas, Georgios Mylonas, Bilal Haj Najeeb, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth, Gabor Deak

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Automated measurement of macular neovascularization lesion size in nAMD using AI segmentation.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology in the Retina.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David Holomcik *Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Philipp Seeböck *Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Bianca S GerendasDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8940-8130
Georgios MylonasDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Bilal Haj NajeebDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ursula Schmidt-ErfurthDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. ursula.schmidt-erfurth@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-7788-7311
Gabor DeakDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesWe aim to develop an objective fully automated Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for MNV lesion size and leakage area segmentation on fluorescein angiography (FA) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). SUBJECTS/

methodsTwo FA image datasets collected form large prospective multicentre trials consisting of 4710 images from 513 patients and 4558 images from 514 patients were used to develop and evaluate a deep learning-based algorithm to detect CNV lesion size and leakage area automatically. Manual segmentation of was performed by certified FA graders of the Vienna Reading Center. Precision, Recall and F1 score between AI predictions and manual annotations were computed. In addition, two masked retina experts conducted a clinical-applicability evaluation, comparing the quality of AI based and manual segmentations.

resultsFor CNV lesion size and leakage area segmentation, we obtained F1 scores of 0.73 and 0.65, respectively. Expert review resulted in a slight preference for the automated segmentations in both datasets. The quality of automated segmentations was slightly more often judged as good compared to manual annotations.

conclusionsCNV lesion size and leakage area can be segmented by our automated model at human-level performance, its output being well-accepted during clinical applicability testing. The results provide proof-of-concept that an automated deep learning approach can improve efficacy of objective biomarker analysis in FA images and will be well-suited for clinical application.

Indexed as

Choroidal NeovascularizationDeep LearningMacular DegenerationArtificial IntelligenceFluorescein AngiographyHumansProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35778604
PMCPMC10169785
OpenAlexW4283739154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.