ArticleScientific reports2022
An accurate alignment-free protein sequence comparator based on physicochemical properties of amino acids.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bio-sequence comparators are one of the most basic and significant methods for assessing biological data, and so, due to the importance of proteins, protein sequence comparators are particularly crucial. On the other hand, the complexity of the problem, the growing number of extracted protein sequences, and the growth of studies and data analysis applications addressing protein sequences have necessitated the development of a rapid and accurate approach to account for the complexities in this field. As a result, we propose a protein sequence comparison approach, called PCV, which improves comparison accuracy by producing vectors that encode sequence data as well as physicochemical properties of the amino acids. At the same time, by partitioning the long protein sequences into fix-length blocks and providing encoding vector for each block, this method allows for parallel and fast implementation. To evaluate the performance of PCV, like other alignment-free methods, we used 12 benchmark datasets including classes with homologous sequences which may require a simple preprocessing search tool to select the homologous data. And then, we compared the protein sequence comparison outcomes to those of alternative alignment-based and alignment-free methods, using various evaluation criteria. These results indicate that our method provides significant improvement in sequence classification accuracy, compared to the alternative alignment-free methods and has an average correlation of about 94% with the ClustalW method as our reference method, while considerably reduces the processing time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.