Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35778547›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2022

Pattern of recurrence and survival after D2 right colectomy for cancer: is there place for a routine more extended lymphadenectomy?

Matteo Palmeri, Andrea Peri, Valentina Pucci, Niccolò Furbetta, Virginia Gallo, Gregorio Di Franco, Anna Pagani, Chiara Dauccia, Camilla Farè, Desirée Gianardi and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matteo PalmeriGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9343-278X
Andrea PeriDepartment of General Surgery, University of Pavia, 27100, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5911-0218
Valentina PucciGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5129-2504
Niccolò FurbettaGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7135-2666
Virginia GalloDepartment of General Surgery, University of Pavia, 27100, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4008-6120
Gregorio Di FrancoGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-369X
Anna PaganiMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9512-5567
Chiara DaucciaMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3870-142X
Camilla FarèDepartment of General Surgery, University of Pavia, 27100, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6910-0099
Desirée GianardiGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6238-9176
Simone GuadagniGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9072-8166
Matteo BianchiniGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2403-0621
Annalisa ComandatoreGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6930-0595
Gianluca MasiOncology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56124, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8329-8989
Chiara CremoliniOncology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56124, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0520-4841
Beatrice BorelliOncology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56124, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9739-408X
Luca Emanuele PollinaDivision of Surgical Pathology, University-Hospital of Pisa, 56124, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7163-8050
Giulio Di CandioGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5221-2756
Andrea PietrabissaDepartment of General Surgery, University of Pavia, 27100, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9703-7587
Luca MorelliGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy. luca.morelli@unipi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7742-9556
University of Pisa · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional Right Colectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy (RC-D2) currently represent the most common surgical treatment of right-sided colon cancer (RCC). However, whether it should be still considered a standard of care, or replaced by a routine more extended D3 lymphadenectomy remains unclear. In the present study, we aim to critically review the patterns of relapse and the survival outcomes obtained from our 11-year experience of RC-D2.

methodsClinical data of 489 patients who underwent RC-D2 for RCC at two centres, from January 2009 to January 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with synchronous distant metastases and/or widespread nodal involvement at diagnosis were excluded. Post-operative clinical-pathological characteristics and survival outcomes were evaluated including the pattern of disease relapse.

resultsWe enrolled a total of 400 patients with information follow-up. Postoperative morbidity was 14%. The median follow-up was 62 months. Cancer recurrence was observed in 55 patients (13.8%). Among them, 40 patients (72.7%) developed systemic metastases, and lymph-node involvement was found in 7 cases (12.8%). None developed isolated central lymph-node metastasis (CLM), in the D3 site. The estimated 3- and 5-year relapse-free survival were 86.1% and 84.4%, respectively. The estimated 3- and 5-year cancer-specific OS were 94.5% and 92.2%, respectively.

conclusionsThe absence of isolated CLM, as well as the cancer-specific OS reported in our series, support the routine use of RC-D2 for RCC. However, D3 lymphadenectomy may be recommended in selected patients, such as those with pre-operatively known CLM, or with lymph-node metastases close to the origin of the ileocolic vessels.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellColonic NeoplasmsKidney NeoplasmsLaparoscopyColectomyHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesColon cancerComplete mesocolic excisionD2 standard lymphadenectomyD3 lymphadenectomyRight colectomySurgery

Identifiers

PMID35778547
PMCPMC9338120
OpenAlexW4283753817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.