Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35778543›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

New insights on the evolutionary relationships between the major lineages of Amoebozoa.

Yonas I Tekle, Fang Wang, Fiona C Wood, O Roger Anderson, Alexey Smirnov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Statistical and mechanical analysis of multi-pseudopodial locomotion in a testate amoeba, Arcella sp.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Multiple types of nuclear localization signals inBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yonas I TekleDepartment of Biology, Spelman College, 350 Spelman Lane Southwest, Atlanta, GA, 30314, USA. ytekle@spelman.edu.
Fang WangDepartment of Biology, Spelman College, 350 Spelman Lane Southwest, Atlanta, GA, 30314, USA.
Fiona C WoodDepartment of Biology, Spelman College, 350 Spelman Lane Southwest, Atlanta, GA, 30314, USA.
O Roger AndersonDepartment of Biology and Paleo Environment, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA.
Alexey SmirnovDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

Unraveling the mechanism of cryptic sexual cycle in Amoeba, Cochliopodium, using comparative transcriptome and immunocytochemistryR15GM116103 · NIGMS · SPELMAN COLLEGE · PI TEKLE, YONAS · 2015 to 2020
$726k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM116103NIH HHS 1R15GM116103-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The supergroup Amoebozoa unites a wide diversity of amoeboid organisms and encompasses enigmatic lineages that have been recalcitrant to modern phylogenetics. Deep divergences, taxonomic placement of some key taxa and character evolution in the group largely remain poorly elucidated or controversial. We surveyed available Amoebozoa genomes and transcriptomes to mine conserved putative single copy genes, which were used to enrich gene sampling and generate the largest supermatrix in the group to date; encompassing 824 genes, including gene sequences not previously analyzed. We recovered a well-resolved and supported tree of Amoebozoa, revealing novel deep level relationships and resolving placement of enigmatic lineages congruent with morphological data. In our analysis the deepest branching group is Tubulinea. A recent proposed major clade Tevosa, uniting Evosea and Tubulinea, is not supported. Based on the new phylogenetic tree, paleoecological and paleontological data as well as data on the biology of presently living amoebozoans, we hypothesize that the evolution of Amoebozoa probably was driven by adaptive responses to a changing environment, where successful survival and predation resulted from a capacity to disrupt and graze on microbial mats-a dominant ecosystem of the mid-Proterozoic period of the Earth history.

Indexed as

AmoebaAmoebozoaLoboseaEcosystemPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID35778543
PMCPMC9249873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.