Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35778530›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Impact of COVID-19 emergency on the psychological well-being of susceptible individuals.

Angela Stufano, Guglielmo Lucchese, Benjamin Stahl, Ignazio Grattagliano, Liliana Dassisti, Piero Lovreglio, Agnes Flöel, Ivo Iavicoli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Angela Stufano *Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Occupational Medicine 'EC Vigliani', University of Bari, Policlinico, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Guglielmo Lucchese *Department of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1809-6376
Benjamin StahlDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Ignazio GrattaglianoDepartment of Education Science, Psychology, Communication Science, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Liliana DassistiDepartment of Education Science, Psychology, Communication Science, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Piero LovreglioInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Occupational Medicine 'EC Vigliani', University of Bari, Policlinico, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy. piero.lovreglio@uniba.it.
Agnes FlöelDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Ivo IavicoliDepartment of Public Health, Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0444-3792

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current pandemic has exerted an unprecedented psychological impact on the world population, and its effects on mental health are a growing concern. The present study aims to evaluate psychological well-being (PWB) during the COVID-19 crisis in university workers with one or more diseases likely to increase the risk of severe outcomes in the event of SARS-CoV-2 infection, defined as susceptible. 210 susceptible employees of an Italian University (aged 25-71 years) were recruited during the COVID-19 second wave (October-December 2020). A group comprising 90 healthy university employees (aged 26-69 years) was also recruited. The self-report Psychological General Well Being Index (PGWBI) was used to assess global PWB and the influence on six sub-domains: anxiety, depressed mood, positive well-being, self-control, general health, and vitality. We applied non-linear dimension-reduction techniques and regression methods to 45 variables in order to assess the main demographic, occupational, and general-health-related factors predicting PWB during the COVID-19 crisis. PGWBI score was higher in susceptible than in healthy workers, both as total score (mean 77.8 vs 71.3) and across almost all subscales. Age and jobs involving high social interaction before the pandemic were inversely associated with the PWB total score, general health, and self-control subscores. The current data suggest no decline in PWB during the second wave of COVID-19 health emergency in susceptible individuals of working age. Critically, higher risk for mental-health issues appears to be inversely related to age, particularly among individuals deprived of their previous level of social interaction at work.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnxietyHumansMental HealthPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35778530
PMCPMC9247931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.