Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35778500›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2023

Clinical enrollment assay to detect preexisting neutralizing antibodies to AAV6 with demonstrated transgene expression in gene therapy trials.

Liching Cao, Annemarie Ledeboer, Yonghua Pan, Yanmei Lu, Kathleen Meyer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Immune Toxicities in AAV Gene Therapy: Overview for Clinicians.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Binding and neutralizing anti-AAV antibodies: Detection and implications for rAAV-mediated gene therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liching CaoSangamo Therapeutics, Inc, Brisbane, CA, 94005, USA. lcao@sangamo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2567-5480
Annemarie LedeboerSangamo Therapeutics, Inc, Brisbane, CA, 94005, USA.
Yonghua PanSangamo Therapeutics, Inc, Brisbane, CA, 94005, USA.
Yanmei LuSangamo Therapeutics, Inc, Brisbane, CA, 94005, USA.
Kathleen MeyerSangamo Therapeutics, Inc, Brisbane, CA, 94005, USA.
Sangamo BioSciences (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors are the leading platform for gene delivery for a variety of clinical applications. Patients with preexisting antibodies to AAV are currently excluded from most AAV gene therapy trials to avoid vector neutralization and ensure response to therapy. Anti-AAV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are typically assessed by in vitro cell-based transduction inhibition (TI) assays. However, clinical relevance of the determined enrollment cutoff and the inherent variability of a cell-based assay present challenges for use as an enrollment screening test. Here, we describe an enrollment cutoff that was clinically validated and strategies to overcome assay challenges to enable long-term stable performance. A validated anti-AAV6 cell-based TI assay was used to support clinical enrollment across multiple investigational gene therapies and to evaluate AAV6 seroprevalence in healthy and disease populations. The clinical enrollment cutoff was determined statistically using samples collected from healthy donors, applying a 0.1% false error rate with the inclusion of a minimum significant ratio (MSR) metric and in consideration of results from in vivo mouse passive transfer studies. Our strategy for long-term monitoring and control of assay performance employed plate quality control samples flanking the predefined cutoff. An approach using donor samples was implemented to bridge different lots of critical reagents without the need to redefine the cutoff.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingGenetic VectorsAnimalsAntibodies, ViralDependovirusGenetic TherapyMiceSeroepidemiologic StudiesTransgenesAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID35778500
PMCPMC9935387
OpenAlexW4283745544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.