ArticleScientific reports2022
Computational assessment of groundwater salinity distribution within coastal multi-aquifers of Bangladesh.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kernel principal component analysis-based water quality index modelling for coastal aquifers in Saudi Arabia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Study on salt deposition distribution and environmental effect of seawater cooling tower.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-step ahead forecasting of electrical conductivity in rivers by using a hybrid Convolutional Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) model enhanced by Boruta-XGBoost feature selection algorithm.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Groundwater quality characterization using an integrated water quality index and multivariate statistical techniques.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rising salinity trend in the country's coastal groundwater has reached an alarming rate due to unplanned use of groundwater in agriculture and seawater seeping into the underground due to sea-level rise caused by global warming. Therefore, assessing salinity is crucial for the status of safe groundwater in coastal aquifers. In this research, a rigorous hybrid neurocomputing approach comprised of an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) hybridized with a new meta-heuristic optimization algorithm, namely Aquila optimization (AO) and the Boruta-Random forest feature selection (FS) was developed for estimating the salinity of multi-aquifers in coastal regions of Bangladesh. In this regard, 539 data samples, including ten water quality indices, were collected to provide the predictive model. Moreover, the individual ANFIS, Slime Mould Algorithm (SMA), and Ant Colony Optimization for Continuous Domains (ACOR) coupled with ANFIS (i.e., ANFIS-SMA and ANFIS-ACOR) and LASSO regression (Lasso-Reg) schemes were examined to compare with the primary model. Several goodness-of-fit indices, such as correlation coefficient (R), the root mean squared error (RMSE), and Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE) were used to validate the robustness of the predictive models. Here, the Boruta-Random Forest (B-RF), as a new robust tree-based FS, was adopted to identify the most significant candidate inputs and effective input combinations to reduce the computational cost and time of the modeling. The outcomes of four selected input combinations ascertained that the ANFIS-OA regarding the best accuracy in terms of (R = 0.9450, RMSE = 1.1253 ppm, and KGE = 0.9146) outperformed the ANFIS-SMA (R = 0.9406, RMSE = 1.1534 ppm, and KGE = 0.8793), ANFIS-ACOR (R = 0.9402, RMSE = 1.1388 ppm, and KGE = 0.8653), Lasso-Reg (R = 0.9358), and ANFIS (R = 0.9306) models. Besides, the first candidate input combination (C1) by three inputs, including Cl
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.