ArticleNature communications2022
A litmus test for classifying recognition mechanisms of transiently binding proteins.
Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dissecting mechanisms of ligand binding and conformational changes in the glutamine-binding protein.eLife · 2026Article
- The Allosteric Mechanism of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors is Induced Fit, Not Conformational Selection.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Kinetic Dissection of Proton-Coupled Conformational Transitions in Nucleic Acids by Integrating pH-Dependent NMR and Chemical Modifications.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Ligand-induced protein transition state stabilization switches the binding pathway from conformational selection to induced fit.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Folding-upon-binding pathways of an intrinsically disordered protein from a deep Markov state model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Markov State Models: To Optimize or Not to Optimize.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Optimal control pulses for the 1.2-GHz (28.2-T) NMR spectrometers.Science advances · 2023Article
- Folding-upon-binding pathways of an intrinsically disordered protein from a deep Markov state model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Immune Receptors and Ligands.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Partner recognition in protein binding is critical for all biological functions, and yet, delineating its mechanism is challenging, especially when recognition happens within microseconds. We present a theoretical and experimental framework based on straight-forward nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation dispersion measurements to investigate protein binding mechanisms on sub-millisecond timescales, which are beyond the reach of standard rapid-mixing experiments. This framework predicts that conformational selection prevails on ubiquitin's paradigmatic interaction with an SH3 (Src-homology 3) domain. By contrast, the SH3 domain recognizes ubiquitin in a two-state binding process. Subsequent molecular dynamics simulations and Markov state modeling reveal that the ubiquitin conformation selected for binding exhibits a characteristically extended C-terminus. Our framework is robust and expandable for implementation in other binding scenarios with the potential to show that conformational selection might be the design principle of the hubs in protein interaction networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.