Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35778396›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Revisiting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy around the world using data from 23 countries in 2021.

Jeffrey V Lazarus, Katarzyna Wyka, Trenton M White, Camila A Picchio, Kenneth Rabin, Scott C Ratzan, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Jia Hu, Ayman El-Mohandes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 235 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
235citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
70.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

235 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 438 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Reminders, but not monetary incentives, increase COVID-19 booster uptake.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. How Can Multi-Criteria Portfolio Decision Analysis Help Mitigate Mis/Disinformation?Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Sociodemographic and Lifestyle Factors Associated With COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake in a Mixed Urban-Rural Population in Eastern Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

175 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jeffrey V LazarusBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. jeffrey.lazarus@isglobal.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9618-2299
Katarzyna WykaGraduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, US.
Trenton M WhiteBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0633-4445
Camila A PicchioBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Kenneth RabinGraduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, US.
Scott C RatzanGraduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, US.
Jeanna Parsons LeighSchool of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Jia HuUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Ayman El-MohandesGraduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, US.
City University of New York · USBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESDalhousie University · CAThe Graduate Center, CUNY · USUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to impact daily life, including health system operations, despite the availability of vaccines that are effective in greatly reducing the risks of death and severe disease. Misperceptions of COVID-19 vaccine safety, efficacy, risks, and mistrust in institutions responsible for vaccination campaigns have been reported as factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy. This study investigated COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy globally in June 2021. Nationally representative samples of 1,000 individuals from 23 countries were surveyed. Data were analyzed descriptively, and weighted multivariable logistic regressions were used to explore associations with vaccine hesitancy. Here, we show that more than three-fourths (75.2%) of the 23,000 respondents report vaccine acceptance, up from 71.5% one year earlier. Across all countries, vaccine hesitancy is associated with a lack of trust in COVID-19 vaccine safety and science, and skepticism about its efficacy. Vaccine hesitant respondents are also highly resistant to required proof of vaccination; 31.7%, 20%, 15%, and 14.8% approve requiring it for access to international travel, indoor activities, employment, and public schools, respectively. For ongoing COVID-19 vaccination campaigns to succeed in improving coverage going forward, substantial challenges remain to be overcome. These include increasing vaccination among those reporting lower vaccine confidence in addition to expanding vaccine access in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansPandemicsPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID35778396
PMCPMC9247969
OpenAlexW4283758677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.