Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35778367›Full record

ArticlePsychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society2022

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on well-being of seniors attending online programs at University of the Third Age: a follow-up study.

Fatma Özge Kayhan Koçak, Sibel Çavdar, Sumru Savas, Selahattin Fehmi Akçiçek

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fatma Özge Kayhan KoçakDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6447-2352
Sibel ÇavdarDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4570-3071
Sumru SavasDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4836-3786
Selahattin Fehmi AkçiçekDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2583-4709
Ege University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReports on psychological effects of quarantine during past outbreaks and pandemics showed that quarantined people were more likely to experience psychological problems than those who were not. It was also shown that there was an increase in anxiety, depression, and stress in all age groups during the COVID-19 pandemic. So, we investigated emotional states and quality of life as components of general well-being in older participants of University of the Third Age (U3A) attending online programs during the second year of the pandemic, and compared them with the pre-pandemic COVID-19 period.

methodsThis study was conducted among 27 participants of a U3A program. Data on sociodemographics, Charlson comorbidity index, the Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (GDS-SF), The Geriatric Anxiety Scale (GAS), and Turkish version of World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-OLD) were taken in September 2019 and September 2021.

resultsThe median age of the participants was 68 (60-75) years (81.5% female). In the COVID-19 pandemic period; 'Death and dying' (except for 'Fear of pain before death' score), 'Intimacy' domain, and 'Social participation' domain scores of WHOQOL-OLD decreased compared to the pre-pandemic period (P < 0.001, P = 0.011, and P < 0.001, respectively) whereas the scores for GAS and GDS-SF were higher (P < 0.001 and P = 0.011). The reason for the decrease in 'Social participation' domain scores was the decrease in 'Satisfaction with opportunity to participate in community'. There was no significant difference in 'Autonomy' domain of WHOQOL-OLD (P = 0.598).

conclusionAlthough there was no change in 'Autonomy' domain among the participants of U3A before and during the pandemic period, anxiety and depression scores were higher in the second year of the COVID pandemic. Only a decrease in satisfaction with opportunity to participate in community might have significant impact on social participation.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAgedAnxietyDepressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleQuality of LifeQuarantineanxietyCOVID-19depressionolderquality of life

Identifiers

PMID35778367
PMCPMC9349604
OpenAlexW4283781782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.