ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2022
Ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation in nonlinear regime using an in situ calibration target.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In Vivo Validation of an In Situ Calibration Bead as a Reference for Backscatter Coefficient Calculation.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue characterization based on the backscatter coefficient (BSC) can be degraded by acoustic nonlinearity. Often, this degradation is due to the method used for obtaining a reference spectrum, i.e., using a planar reference in water compared to a reference phantom approach resulted in more degradation. We hypothesize that an in situ calibration approach can improve BSC estimates in the nonlinear regime compared to using the reference phantom approach. The in situ calibration target provides a reference within the medium being interrogated and, therefore, nonlinear effects would already be contained in the in situ reference signal. Simulations and experiments in phantoms and in vivo were performed. A 2 mm diameter titanium bead was embedded in the interrogated media. An L9-4/38 probe (BK Ultrasound, Peabody, MA) and an analysis bandwidth from 4.5 to 7.4 MHz were used in experiments. Radiofrequency data from the sample, bead, and reference phantoms were acquired at a quasi-linear baseline power level and at further increments of output power. Better agreement between the BSC obtained at low power compared to high power was observed for the in situ calibration compared to the reference phantom approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.