Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35777879›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Revalidation and adaptation of the Menstrual Practice Needs Scale (MPNS) in a cross-sectional survey to measure the menstrual experiences of adult women working in Mukono District, Uganda.

Julie Hennegan, Justine N Bukenya, Simon P S Kibira, Petranilla Nakamya, Fredrick E Makumbi, Natalie G Exum, Kellogg J Schwab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julie HenneganMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia julie.hennegan@burnet.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2011-1595
Justine N BukenyaDepartment of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Central, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-9139-6183
Simon P S KibiraDepartment of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Central, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-7385-423X
Petranilla NakamyaDepartment of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Central, Uganda.
Fredrick E MakumbiEpidemiology & Biostatistics, Makerere University, Kampala, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-6460-7325
Natalie G ExumEnvironmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University,Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8374-4034
Kellogg J SchwabEnvironmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University,Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4966-8517

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Menstrual Practice Needs Scale (MPNS) is a comprehensive measure of menstrual self-care experience including access to sufficient, comfortable materials to catch or absorb bleeding, supportive spaces for managing menstruation and for disposal and laundering of used materials. It addresses a critical measurement gap to improve quantitative menstrual health research and programme evaluation. The scale was validated in a population of adolescent schoolgirls. This study appraises its performance among adult women.

designCross-sectional survey. SETTING AND

participantsSeven cognitive interviews provided insights into the interpretability of scale items. A survey of 525 working women who had menstruated in the past 6 months (435 working in markets, 45 in schools and 45 working in healthcare facilities) in Mukono District, Uganda was used to test the dimensionality, reliability and validity of the measure.

resultsThe 36 scale items were well understood by the study population. Dimensionality was tested for the 28 items relevant to women disposing of menstrual materials and 32 items relevant to those washing and reusing materials. The original subscale structure fit with the data, however, fell short of recommended thresholds for those disposing of materials (root mean squared error of approximation, RMSEA=0.069; Comparative Fit Index, CFI=0.840; Trucker-Lewis Index, TLI=0.824). An alternative subscale structure was an acceptable fit for those disposing (RMSEA=0.051; CFI=0.911; TLI=0.897) and reusing materials (RMSEA=0.053; CFI=0.915; TLI=0.904). MPNS total and subscale scores demonstrated acceptable internal consistency. Higher scores reflected more positive menstrual experiences and were associated with well-being (total score r=0.24, p<0.001), not missing work due to the last menstrual period (total score OR=2.47 95% CI 1.42 to 4.30) and confidence to manage menstruation.

conclusionsThe MPNS offers a valid and reliable way to assess menstrual health needs. The revised factor structure can be used for samples of adult workers. Findings also highlight challenges in assessing the variety of experiences relevant to managing menstrual bleeding.

Indexed as

MenstruationAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesUgandamental healthpublic healthreproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID35777879
PMCPMC9252208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.