Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35777273›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2022

Chemotherapy and gene expression profiling in older early luminal breast cancer patients: An International Society of Geriatric Oncology systematic review.

Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti, Nienke De Glas, Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis, Gabor Liposits, Michael Bringuier, Christine Walko, Stuart M Lichtman, Matti Aapro, Kwok-Leung Cheung, Laura Biganzoli and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.

Nicolò Matteo Luca BattistiBreast Unit - Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: nicolo.battisti@rmh.nhs.uk.
Nienke De GlasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: n.a.de_glas@lumc.nl.
Enrique Soto-Perez-de-CelisDepartment of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico. Electronic address: enrique.sotop@incmnsz.mx.
Gabor LipositsDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense, Denmark. Electronic address: gabor.istvan.liposits@rsyd.dk.
Michael BringuierInterdisciplinary Supportive Care Department for Cancer Patients and Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie/Saint-Cloud, Paris, France. Electronic address: michael.bringuier@curie.fr.
Christine WalkoDepartment of Individualized Cancer Management, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA. Electronic address: christine.walko@moffitt.org.
Stuart M LichtmanDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: stuart.lichtman@alumni.mssm.edu.
Matti AaproGenolier Cancer Centre, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland. Electronic address: maapro@genolier.net.
Kwok-Leung CheungSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital Centre, Derby, UK. Electronic address: kl.cheung@nottingham.ac.uk.
Laura Biganzoli"Sandro Pitigliani" Department of Medical Oncology, Nuovo Ospedale di Prato, Prato, Italy. Electronic address: laura.biganzoli@uslcentro.toscana.it.
Alistair RingBreast Unit - Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: alistair.ring@rmh.nhs.uk.
Johanneke PortieljeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.portielje@lumc.nl.
Hans WildiersDepartment of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: hans.wildiers@uzleuven.be.
Etienne BrainDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie/Saint-Cloud, Paris, France. Electronic address: etienne.brain@curie.fr.
Institut Curie · FRLeiden University Medical Center · NLRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBClinique de Genolier · CHInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán · MXKU Leuven · BEMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USOspedale di Prato Santo Stefano · ITUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefit of chemotherapy for older patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer (EBC) is a key area of debate. Gene expression profiling (GEP) may identify patients deriving benefit, but their predictive role has not been established for older adults. We summarise evidence on efficacy, safety, and quality-of-life impacts of chemotherapy and on GEP use and impact in older HR-positive, HER2-negative EBC patients.

methodsWe conducted a literature search of PubMed and Embase on publications describing prospective studies evaluating chemotherapy in older adults with HR-positive, HER2-negative EBC and on publications describing retrospective and prospective studies evaluating GEP in older adults.

resultsEight publications on chemotherapy use, including 2,035 older patients with EBC were selected. Only one trial evaluated chemotherapy survival benefits in older adults, showing no benefit. Of four studies comparing different regimens, only one showed the superiority of taxanes versus anthracyclines alone. Those investigating alternative regimens did not show improvements over standard regimens despite significant limitations. Five publications on GEP, including 445,323 older patients, were included and investigated Oncotype DX. Limited evidence shows that GEP aids treatment decisions in this population. GEP was offered less frequently to older versus younger patients. Higher Recurrence Score was prognostic for distant recurrence, but chemotherapy did not improve prognosis.

conclusionsIn older patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, chemotherapy survival benefits EBC are unclear and GEP is less used. Although its prognostic role is well established, its predictive role remains unknown.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansPrognosisProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesChemotherapyEarly breast cancerGene expression profileLuminalOlder

Identifiers

PMID35777273
PMCPMC10861271
OpenAlexW4283707599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.