Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35777055›Full record

ReviewMedicine2022

How physical techniques improve the transdermal permeation of therapeutics: A review.

Yan Gao, Lina Du, Qian Li, Qi Li, Lin Zhu, Meiyan Yang, Xiu Wang, Bonian Zhao, Shan Ma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yan GaoInstitute of Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Lina DuInstitute of Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8103-5974
Qian LiInstitute of Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Qi LiInstitute of Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Lin ZhuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China.
Meiyan YangState Key Laboratory of Toxicology and Medical Countermeasures, Beijing Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Beijing, China.
Xiu WangSchool of Medicine, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, China.
Bonian ZhaoInstitute of Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Shan MaShandong Co-Innovation Center of Classic TCM Formula, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransdermal delivery is very important in pharmaceutics. However, the barrier function of the stratum corneum hinders drugs absorption. How to improve transdermal delivery efficiency is a hot topic. The key advantages of physical technologies are their wide application for the delivery of previously nonappropriate transdermal drugs, such as proteins, peptides, and hydrophilic drugs. Based on the improved permeation of drugs delivered via multiple physical techniques, many more diseases may be treated, and transdermal vaccinations become possible. However, their wider application depends on the related convenient and portable devices. Combined products comprising medicine and devices represent future commercial directions of artificial intelligence and 3D printing.

methodsA comprehensive search about transdermal delivery assisted by physical techniques has been carried out on Web of Science, EMBASE database, PubMed, Wanfang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Cochrane Library. The search identified and retrieved the study describing multiple physical technologies to promote transdermal penetration.

resultsPhysical technologies, including microneedles, lasers, iontophoresis, sonophoresis, electroporation, magnetophoresis, and microwaves, are summarized and compared. The characteristics, mechanism, advantages and disadvantages of physical techniques are clarified. The individual or combined applicable examples of physical techniques to improve transdermal delivery are summarized.

conclusionThis review will provide more useful guidance for efficient transdermal delivery. More therapeutic agents by transdermal routes become possible with the assistance of various physical techniques.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSkinAdministration, CutaneousDrug Delivery SystemsHumansIontophoresisPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID35777055
PMCPMC9239599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.