Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35776772›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Sparse representation of brain signals offers effective computation of cortico-muscular coupling value to predict the task-related and non-task sEMG channels: A joint hdEEG-sEMG study.

Ahmadreza Keihani, Amin Mohammad Mohammadi, Hengameh Marzbani, Shahriar Nafissi, Mohsen Reza Haidari, Amir Homayoun Jafari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmadreza KeihaniDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I.R. Iran.
Amin Mohammad MohammadiResearch Center for Biomedical Technologies and Robotics (RCBTR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I.R. Iran.
Hengameh MarzbaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, I.R. Iran.
Shahriar NafissiDepartment of Neurology, Neuromuscular Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I.R. Iran.
Mohsen Reza HaidariSection of Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I.R. Iran.
Amir Homayoun JafariDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I.R. Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1759-2079

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortico-muscular interactions play important role in sensorimotor control during motor task and are commonly studied by cortico-muscular coherence (CMC) method using joint electroencephalogram-surface electromyogram (EEG-sEMG) signals. As noise and time delay between the two signals weaken the CMC value, coupling difference between non-task sEMG channels is often undetectable. We used sparse representation of EEG channels to compute CMC and detect coupling for task-related and non-task sEMG signals. High-density joint EEG-sEMG (53 EEG channels, 4 sEMG bipolar channels) signals were acquired from 15 subjects (30.26 ± 4.96 years) during four specific hand and foot contraction tasks (2 dynamic and 2 static contraction). Sparse representations method was applied to detect projection of EEG signals on each sEMG channel. Bayesian optimization was employed to select best-fitted method with tuned hyperparameters on the input feeding data while using 80% data as the train set and 20% as test set. K-fold (K = 5) cross-validation method was used for evaluation of trained model. Two models were trained separately, one for CMC data and the other from sparse representation of EEG channels on each sEMG channel. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy criteria were obtained for test dataset to evaluate the performance of task-related and non-task sEMG channels detection. Coupling values were significantly different between grand average of task-related compared to the non-task sEMG channels (Z = -6.33, p< 0.001, task-related median = 2.011, non-task median = 0.112). Strong coupling index was found even in single trial analysis. Sparse representation approach (best fitted model: SVM, Accuracy = 88.12%, Sensitivity = 83.85%, Specificity = 92.45%) outperformed CMC method (best fitted model: KNN, Accuracy = 50.83%, Sensitivity = 52.17%, Specificity = 49.47%). Sparse representation approach offers high performance to detect CMC for discerning the EMG channels involved in the contraction tasks and non-tasks.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectroencephalographyBayes TheoremBrainElectromyographyHumans

Identifiers

PMID35776772
PMCPMC9249190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.