Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35776699›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Mixed methods prospective findings of the initial effects of the U.S. COVID-19 pandemic on individuals in recovery from substance use disorder.

Katherine Shircliff, Melissa Liu, Christiana Prestigiacomo, Melissa Fry, Kevin Ladd, Misty Kannapel Gilbert, Mary Jo Rattermann, Melissa A Cyders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katherine ShircliffDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9895-6080
Melissa LiuDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.
Christiana PrestigiacomoDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.
Melissa FryDepartment of Sociology, Indiana University Southeast, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.
Kevin LaddDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University South Bend, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.
Misty Kannapel GilbertLifeSpring Healthcare System, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.
Mary Jo RattermannResearch & Evaluation Resources LLC, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.
Melissa A CydersDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The beginning of the U.S. COVID-19 pandemic interrupted integral services and supports for those in recovery from substance use disorders. The current study used qualitative and quantitative data to identify 1) pandemic-related barriers/stressors, 2) coping strategies employed, and 3) how the stressors and strategies predicted subsequent substance use frequency. Participants were 48 adults (40.5% female; 90.2% White) between 26 and 60 years old (M = 42.66, SD = 8.44) who were part of a larger, multi-year longitudinal study of individuals in recovery from substance use disorders. Individuals completed two interviews, one during the six weeks of initial stay-at-home orders in the state in which data were collected and the second within six to twelve months of their initial interview. Common barriers to recovery included cancelled support meetings, changes in job format (i.e., being fired or furloughed), and lack of social support. Common coping strategies included self-care, leisure activities/hobbies, taking caution against exposure, and strengthening personal relationships. The relationship between cravings at baseline and substance use at follow up was stronger for those who experienced worsening of their mental health (B = 21.80, p < .01) than for those who did not (B = 5.45, p = 0.09), and for those who were taking caution against exposure (B = 24.57, p < .01) than for those who were not (B = 1.87, p = 0.53). Those who engaged in self-care (B = 0.00, p>.99) had lower rates of substance use at follow-up than those who did not employ self-care as a coping mechanism (B = 16.10, p < .01). These findings inform research priorities regarding prospective effects of the pandemic on treatment endeavors, particularly emphasizing treating mental health and encouraging self-care strategies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Substance-Related DisordersAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPandemics

Identifiers

PMID35776699
PMCPMC9249176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.