Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35776669›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2022

The UN Decade of healthy ageing: strengthening measurement for monitoring health and wellbeing of older people.

Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan, Christopher Mikton, Rowan H Harwood, Muthoni Gichu, Victor Gaigbe-Togbe, Tapiwa Jhamba, Daniela Pokorna, Valentina Stoevska, Rio Hada, Grace Sanico Steffan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli ThiyagarajanAgeing and Health Unit, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, WHO HQ, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christopher MiktonDemographic Change and Healthy Aging Unit, Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rowan H HarwoodFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Muthoni GichuDivision of Geriatric Medicine at the Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Victor Gaigbe-TogbeDemographic Analysis Section, Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs United Nations, New York, NY, USA.
Tapiwa JhambaPopulation and Development Branch, Technical Division United Nations Population Fund, New York, USA.
Daniela PokornaInternational Telecommunication Union (ITU), ICT Data and Analytics Division, Geneva, Switzerland.
Valentina StoevskaDepartment of Statistics, The International Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rio HadaEconomic, Social and Cultural Rights Section, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Geneva, Switzerland.
Grace Sanico SteffanEconomic, Social and Cultural Rights Section, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Geneva, Switzerland.
Ana LienaDirectorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
Eileen RocardDirectorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
Theresa DiazEpidemiology, Monitoring and Evaluation Unit, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, WHO HQ, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 100 years, life expectancy has increased dramatically in nearly all nations. Yet, these extra years of life gained have not all been healthy, particularly for older people aged 60 years and over. In 2020, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and United Nations (UN) member states embraced a sweeping 10-year global plan of action to ensure all older people can live long and healthy lives, formally known as the UN Decade of Healthy Ageing (2021-2030). With the adoption of the UN Decade of Healthy Ageing resolution, countries are committed to implementing collaborative actions to improve the lives of older people, their families and the communities in which they reside. The Decade addresses four interconnected areas of action. Adopting the UN's resolution on the Decade of Healthy Ageing has caused excitement, but a question that has weighed on everyone's mind is how governments will be held accountable? Besides, there have been no goals or targets set for the UN Decade of Healthy Ageing from a programmatic perspective for the action areas, and guidance on measures, data collection, analysis and reporting are urgently needed to support global, regional and national monitoring of the national strategies, programmes and policies. To this end, WHO in collaboration with UN agencies and international agencies established a Technical Advisory Group for Measurement of Healthy Ageing (TAG4MHA) to provide advice on the measurement, monitoring and evaluation of the UN Decade of Healthy Ageing at the global, regional and national levels.

Indexed as

Healthy AgingAgedHealth StatusHumansLife ExpectancyMiddle AgedUnited Nationsageinghealthy ageingmonitoring and evaluationolder peopleUN Decade of healthy ageing

Identifiers

PMID35776669
PMCPMC9249069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.