ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
Prioritizing the glucose-lowering medicines for type 2 diabetes by an extended fuzzy decision-making approach with target-based attributes.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Defining the Criteria for Selecting the Right Extended Reality Systems in Healthcare Using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multicriteria Decision-Making in Diabetes Management and Decision Support: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Review
- Comparing the clinical and economic efficiency of four natural surfactants in treating infants with respiratory distress syndrome.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Different therapeutic classes have been authorized for the treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetic patients, and even more drug classes are under development. This variety of alternative treatments and the general treatment algorithms of the clinical guidelines lead to a nonuniform prescription of drugs by endocrinologists and diabetic specialists. Diabetes medication choice is a multi-objective problem with many difficulties in making rational decisions because of the wide range of hyperglycemia-lowering agents with multiple benefits and multiple risk elements. This paper proposes a group Entropy-CRiteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC)-Weighted Aggregated Sum Product ASsessment (WASPAS) multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model with target-based criteria to prioritize and rank the glucose-lowering medicines for type 2 diabetes using the American Diabetes Association and International Diabetes Federation Clinical Guidelines. The proposed model consists of a weighting method comprising both objective and subjective approaches; the two most common objective approaches (i.e., Entropy and CRITIC methods) are used to find the objective weights. Then, these weights are aggregated with the subjective weights that endocrinologists assign to the criteria. Afterward, a WASPAS target-based method is developed to provide the final ranking of the medications. Finally, the close correlation between the final ranking of the proposed methodology and the average priority order of the medications obtained by different MCDM methods implies the strength and validity of the model performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.