Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35776372›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2023

Revisiting the Time Needed to Provide Adult Primary Care.

Justin Porter, Cynthia Boyd, M Reza Skandari, Neda Laiteerapong

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 190 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
190citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
81.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

190 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 315 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nurses' Transitions Into and Out of the Home Health Sector.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

130 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Justin PorterDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. jporter1@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8990-8047
Cynthia BoydJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
M Reza SkandariImperial College Business School, Centre for Health Economics & Policy Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Neda LaiteerapongDepartments of Medicine & Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Chicago · USImperial College London · GBJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Ronald T. Ackermann, MARSHALL H CHIN · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Patient-Centered Care for Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions: Research and Mentoring ProgramK24AG056578 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOYD, CYNTHIA MELINDA · 2017 to 2021
$1.1M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG056578NIA NIH HHS K24AG056578NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany patients do not receive guideline-recommended preventive, chronic disease, and acute care. One potential explanation is insufficient time for primary care providers (PCPs) to provide care.

objectiveTo quantify the time needed to provide 2020 preventive care, chronic disease care, and acute care for a nationally representative adult patient panel by a PCP alone, and by a PCP as part of a team-based care model.

designSimulation study applying preventive and chronic disease care guidelines to hypothetical patient panels.

participantsHypothetical panels of 2500 patients, representative of the adult US population based on the 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. MAIN MEASURES: The mean time required for a PCP to provide guideline-recommended preventive, chronic disease and acute care to the hypothetical patient panels. Estimates were also calculated for visit documentation time and electronic inbox management time. Times were re-estimated in the setting of team-based care. KEY

resultsPCPs were estimated to require 26.7 h/day, comprising of 14.1 h/day for preventive care, 7.2 h/day for chronic disease care, 2.2 h/day for acute care, and 3.2 h/day for documentation and inbox management. With team-based care, PCPs were estimated to require 9.3 h per day (2.0 h/day for preventive care and 3.6 h/day for chronic disease care, 1.1 h/day for acute care, and 2.6 h/day for documentation and inbox management).

conclusionsPCPs do not have enough time to provide the guideline-recommended primary care. With team-based care the time requirements would decrease by over half, but still be excessive.

Indexed as

DocumentationPrimary Health CareAdultChronic DiseaseHumansNutrition SurveysChronic disease carePopulation healthPreventive carePrimary careTeam-based care

Identifiers

PMID35776372
PMCPMC9848034
OpenAlexW4283760976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.