Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35776210›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2022

Stochastic enzyme kinetics and the quasi-steady-state reductions: Application of the slow scale linear noise approximation à la Fenichel.

Justin Eilertsen, Kashvi Srivastava, Santiago Schnell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justin EilertsenMathematical Reviews, American Mathematical Society, 416 4th Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA.
Kashvi SrivastavaDepartment of Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Santiago SchnellDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA. santiago.schnell@nd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9477-3914

Funding

Postdoc Stipend Supplement: Developmental Origins of Metabolic Disorders T32T32DK071212 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAVID P OLSON, Kanakadurga Singer · 2005 to 2026
$5.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK071212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The linear noise approximation models the random fluctuations from the mean-field model of a chemical reaction that unfolds near the thermodynamic limit. Specifically, the fluctuations obey a linear Langevin equation up to order [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the size of the chemical system (usually the volume). In the presence of disparate timescales, the linear noise approximation admits a quasi-steady-state reduction referred to as the slow scale linear noise approximation (ssLNA). Curiously, the ssLNAs reported in the literature are slightly different. The differences in the reported ssLNAs lie at the mathematical heart of the derivation. In this work, we derive the ssLNA directly from geometric singular perturbation theory and explain the origin of the different ssLNAs in the literature. Moreover, we discuss the loss of normal hyperbolicity and we extend the ssLNA derived from geometric singular perturbation theory to a non-classical singularly perturbed problem. In so doing, we disprove a commonly-accepted qualifier for the validity of stochastic quasi-steady-state approximation of the Michaelis -Menten reaction mechanism.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, ChemicalStochastic ProcessesLangevin equationLinear noise approximationMichaelis–Menten reaction mechanismQuasi-steady-state approximationSingular perturbationSlow scale linear noise approximationStochastic process

Identifiers

PMID35776210
PMCPMC10191026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.