Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35776203›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2022

Use of an applicator brush with high concentration bleaching gels.

Laís G Bernardi, Michael W Favoreto, Taynara S Carneiro, Alexandra Mena-Serrano, Christiane P F Borges, Alessandra Reis, Alessandro D Loguercio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Influence of Different Protocols on In-Office Bleaching: Whiteness Difference and Hydrogen Peroxide Penetration.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laís G BernardiDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Post-Graduate Program, State University of Ponta Grossa, Rua Carlos Cavalcanti, Bloco M - Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Parana, 4748, Brazil.
Michael W FavoretoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Post-Graduate Program, State University of Ponta Grossa, Rua Carlos Cavalcanti, Bloco M - Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Parana, 4748, Brazil.
Taynara S CarneiroDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Post-Graduate Program, State University of Ponta Grossa, Rua Carlos Cavalcanti, Bloco M - Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Parana, 4748, Brazil.
Alexandra Mena-SerranoDepartment of Dentistry, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.
Christiane P F BorgesDepartment of Chemistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil.
Alessandra ReisDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Post-Graduate Program, State University of Ponta Grossa, Rua Carlos Cavalcanti, Bloco M - Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Parana, 4748, Brazil.
Alessandro D LoguercioDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Post-Graduate Program, State University of Ponta Grossa, Rua Carlos Cavalcanti, Bloco M - Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Parana, 4748, Brazil. aloguercio@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9880-4856
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa · BRUniversidad de Las Américas · EC

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 303332/2017-4Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 308286/2019-7Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate in vitro two high concentration self-mix bleaching gels (35% or 37.5%) with different application tips (with or without an applicator brush) during in-office bleaching. MATERIALS AND

methodsHealthy premolars were randomly assigned to five groups (n = 8): no treatment; 35% HP without applicator brush, 35% HP with applicator brush, 37.5% HP without applicator brush, and 37.5% HP with applicator brush. After the procedures, the concentration of HP transferred into the pulp chamber was evaluated using UV-Vis. The amount of gel used in each group was measured on a precision analytical balance. Color change (ΔE

resultsUsing a tip with an applicator brush expended less gel and left a lower amount of HP inside the pulp chamber compared to the tip without a brush for both bleaching gels (p < 0.0003), although no significant difference in color change was observed (p < 0.05). The 37.5% HP showed a more stable and less acidic pH and a lower amount of HP in the pulp chamber than the 35% HP (p < 0.00001).

conclusionThe HP penetration into the pulp chamber was lower when using an applicator with a brush tip than when using one with a conventional tip. As for the color, both tips were considered to lighten teeth. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: For the application of a self-mixing high concentration in-office bleaching gel, a brush tip should be recommended because its use diminishes the penetration of HP into the pulp chamber and wastes less bleaching gel.

Indexed as

Tooth BleachingTooth Bleaching AgentsBicuspidGelsHumansHydrogen PeroxideHypochlorous AcidPotassium PermanganateGelsHydrogen PeroxideHypochlorous AcidPotassium PermanganateTooth Bleaching AgentsDental enamel permeabilityHydrogen peroxideTooth bleachingTooth permeability

Identifiers

PMID35776203
OpenAlexW4283769089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.