ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2022
Total embedding of spermatic cord and hilar soft tissue in orchiectomy for seminoma: does the extensive sampling improve pathologic risk factors?
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The ductal network in the human testis and epididymis: What belongs to which?Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pure seminomas represent the majority of testicular germ cell tumors and accurate diagnosis and staging require an accurate sampling of radical orchiectomy specimens. The aim of our study is to find the most informative gross sampling method for orchiectomy specimens. We performed the extensive sampling of 88 radical orchiectomy specimens embedding in their entirety testicular hilum, rete testis, hilar soft tissue, and spermatic cord. We examined the impact of this procedure on tumor stage, prognostic parameters (lymphovascular invasion and infiltration of rete testis, epididymis, tunica vaginalis, and spermatic cord), and their relationship with recurrence. Eighty-eight seminomas from 88 radical orchiectomies were sampled. Seventy-seven cases (87.5%) presented as clinical stage I and 11 cases (12.5%) as clinical stage II. The follow-up period range was 18-54 months and 82 patients (93.2%) had a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Tumor size ranged from 0.4 to 16 cm (mean 3.6) requiring a mean of 7.1 sections for entire tumoral sampling. Epididymis required 2 to 8 sections (mean 3.3), and hilum and hilar soft tissues 2 to 9 sections (mean 3.4). Epididymal infiltration and lymphovascular invasion resulted significant at multivariate analysis generating a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with area under curve of 0.778. All the other parameters (except for pagetoid rete testis infiltration) were significant to predict metastasis only at univariate analysis. Extensive sampling of radical orchiectomy specimens does not improve the accuracy of staging in pure seminomas. Lymphovascular invasion and epididymal infiltration are useful to predict metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.