Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35776171›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2022

Meridional ocular magnification after cataract surgery with toric and non-toric intraocular lenses.

Achim Langenbucher, Peter Hoffmann, Alan Cayless, Jascha Wendelstein, Matthias Bolz, Nóra Szentmáry

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Achim LangenbucherDepartment of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str 100 Bldg. 22, 66424, Homburg, Saar, Germany. achim.langenbucher@uks.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9175-6177
Peter HoffmannAugen- Und Laserklinik Castrop-Rauxel, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany.
Alan CaylessSchool of Physical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Jascha WendelsteinDepartment of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str 100 Bldg. 22, 66424, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Matthias BolzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
Nóra SzentmáryDr. Rolf M. Schwiete Center for Limbal Stem Cell and Aniridia Research, Saarland University, Homburg, Saar, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOverall ocular magnification (OOM) and meridional ocular magnification (MOM) with consequent image distortions have been widely ignored in modern cataract surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate OOM and MOM in a general situation with an astigmatic refracting surface.

methodsFrom a large dataset containing biometric measurements (IOLMaster 700) of both eyes of 9734 patients prior to cataract surgery, the equivalent (P

resultsOn average, P

conclusionMatrix representation of the pseudophakic eye allows for a simple and straightforward prediction of OOM and MOM of the pseudophakic eye after cataract surgery. OOM and MOM could be used for estimating monocular image distortions, or differences in overall or meridional magnifications between eyes.

Indexed as

CataractLens, CrystallineLenses, IntraocularPhacoemulsificationBiometryHumansRefraction, OcularRetrospective Studies4 × 4 matrix calculationAniseikoniaImage distortionOcular magnificationParaxial opticsVergence formula

Identifiers

PMID35776171
PMCPMC9666340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.