Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35776146›Full record

Trial reportAbdominal radiology (New York)2022

Diagnostic value of whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient map radiomics analysis in predicting early recurrence of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 5 cm.

Leyao Wang, Bing Feng, Sicong Wang, Jiesi Hu, Meng Liang, Dengfeng Li, Shuang Wang, Xiaohong Ma, Xinming Zhao

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leyao WangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Bing FengDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Sicong WangMagnetic Resonance Imaging Research, General Electric Healthcare (China), Beijing, 100176, China.
Jiesi HuInstitute of Electronical and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology at Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Meng LiangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Dengfeng LiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Shuang WangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Xiaohong Ma *Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. maxiaohong@cicams.ac.cn.
Xinming Zhao *Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. zhaoxinming@cicams.ac.cn.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNHarbin Institute of Technology · CNUnited Imaging Healthcare (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the role of whole-tumor radiomics analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps in predicting early recurrence (ER) of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤ 5 cm and compare the diagnostic efficiency of whole-tumor and single-slice ADC measurements.

methodsOne hundred and seventy patients with primary HCC were randomly divided into the training set (n = 119) and the test set (n = 51). The diagnostic efficiency was compared between the whole-tumor and single-slice ADC measurements. The clinical-radiological model was established by selected significant clinical characteristics and qualitative imaging features. The radiomics model was constructed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression algorithm. The significant clinical-radiological risk factors and radiomics features were integrated to develop the combined model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used for evaluating the predictive performance.

resultsCirrhosis, age, and albumin were significantly associated with ER in the clinical-radiological model selected by the random forest classifier. The diagnostic efficiency of the whole-tumor ADC measurements was slight higher than that of the single-slice (AUC = 0.602 and 0.586, respectively). The clinical-radiological model (AUC = 0.84 and 0.82 in the training and test sets, respectively) showed better diagnostic performance than the radiomics model (AUC = 0.70 and 0.69 in the training and test sets, respectively) in predicting ER. The combined model showed optimal predictive performance with the highest AUC values of 0.88 and 0.85 in the training and test sets, respectively.

conclusionsThe whole-tumor ADC measurements performed better than the single-slice ADC measurements. The clinical-radiological model performed better than the radiomics model for predicting ER in patients with solitary HCC ≤ 5 cm.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsAlgorithmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesROC CurveApparent diffusion coefficientEarly recurrenceHepatocellular carcinomaMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID35776146
OpenAlexW4283764353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.