Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35776125›Full record

ReviewHuman molecular genetics2022

Functional studies of lung cancer GWAS beyond association.

Erping Long, Harsh Patel, Jinyoung Byun, Christopher I Amos, Jiyeon Choi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human molecular genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Single nucleotide variants in lung cancer.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erping LongDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Harsh PatelDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Jinyoung ByunInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Christopher I AmosInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jiyeon ChoiDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0955-2384
National Institutes of Health · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Laboratory of Translational GenomicsZIACP010201 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI PROKUNINA-OLSSON, LIUDMILA · 2010 to 2025
$91.2M
Translating Molecular and Clinical Data to Population Lung Cancer Risk AssessmentU19CA203654 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Christopher I. Amos, Rayjean J. Hung · 2017 to 2026
$23.7M
Sequencing Familial Lung CancerR01CA243483 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Christopher I. Amos, DIPTASRI M MANDAL · 2023 to 2026
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA243483NCI NIH HHS U19 CA203654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fourteen years after the first genome-wide association study (GWAS) of lung cancer was published, approximately 45 genomic loci have now been significantly associated with lung cancer risk. While functional characterization was performed for several of these loci, a comprehensive summary of the current molecular understanding of lung cancer risk has been lacking. Further, many novel computational and experimental tools now became available to accelerate the functional assessment of disease-associated variants, moving beyond locus-by-locus approaches. In this review, we first highlight the heterogeneity of lung cancer GWAS findings across histological subtypes, ancestries and smoking status, which poses unique challenges to follow-up studies. We then summarize the published lung cancer post-GWAS studies for each risk-associated locus to assess the current understanding of biological mechanisms beyond the initial statistical association. We further summarize strategies for GWAS functional follow-up studies considering cutting-edge functional genomics tools and providing a catalog of available resources relevant to lung cancer. Overall, we aim to highlight the importance of integrating computational and experimental approaches to draw biological insights from the lung cancer GWAS results beyond association.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyLung NeoplasmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenomicsHumansLungPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID35776125
PMCPMC9585683
OpenAlexW4283746042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.