Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35775946›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022

Using Twitter data to understand public perceptions of approved versus off-label use for COVID-19-related medications.

Yining Hua, Hang Jiang, Shixu Lin, Jie Yang, Joseph M Plasek, David W Bates, Li Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pharmacovigilance in the digital age: gaining insight from social media data.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Streamlining social media information retrieval for public health research with deep learning.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hierarchical Concept Relations Improve Detection of Off-Label Drug Use in Electronic Health Records Data.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yining HuaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hang JiangMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Shixu LinZhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jie YangZhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Joseph M PlasekDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David W BatesDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6268-1540
Li ZhouDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUnderstanding public discourse on emergency use of unproven therapeutics is essential to monitor safe use and combat misinformation. We developed a natural language processing-based pipeline to understand public perceptions of and stances on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related drugs on Twitter across time.

methodsThis retrospective study included 609 189 US-based tweets between January 29, 2020 and November 30, 2021 on 4 drugs that gained wide public attention during the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, drug therapies with anecdotal evidence; and (2) Molnupiravir and Remdesivir, FDA-approved treatment options for eligible patients. Time-trend analysis was used to understand the popularity and related events. Content and demographic analyses were conducted to explore potential rationales of people's stances on each drug.

resultsTime-trend analysis revealed that Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin received much more discussion than Molnupiravir and Remdesivir, particularly during COVID-19 surges. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin were highly politicized, related to conspiracy theories, hearsay, celebrity effects, etc. The distribution of stance between the 2 major US political parties was significantly different (P < .001); Republicans were much more likely to support Hydroxychloroquine (+55%) and Ivermectin (+30%) than Democrats. People with healthcare backgrounds tended to oppose Hydroxychloroquine (+7%) more than the general population; in contrast, the general population was more likely to support Ivermectin (+14%).

conclusionOur study found that social media users with have different perceptions and stances on off-label versus FDA-authorized drug use across different stages of COVID-19, indicating that health systems, regulatory agencies, and policymakers should design tailored strategies to monitor and reduce misinformation for promoting safe drug use. Our analysis pipeline and stance detection models are made public at https://github.com/ningkko/COVID-drug.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentSocial MediaCytidineDelivery of Health CareHumansHydroxychloroquineHydroxylaminesIvermectinOff-Label UsePandemicsPublic OpinionRetrospective StudiesCytidineHydroxychloroquineHydroxylaminesIvermectinmolnupiravirCOVID-19deep learningdrug safetynatural language processingpublic healthsocial media

Identifiers

PMID35775946
PMCPMC9278189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.