ArticleClinical and experimental dermatology2022
Cost-effectiveness of personalized omalizumab dosing for chronic spontaneous urticaria.
Article in Clinical and experimental dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost-effective omalizumab dosage for chronic urticaria: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Pooled it
- Psychosocial factors and chronic spontaneous urticaria: a systematic review.BMC psychology · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Predictors of response to omalizumab and relapse in chronic spontaneous Urticaria: a narrative review focusing on parameters available in routine clinical practice.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Review
- Comparison of long term efficacy and cost-effectiveness of omalizumab in 150 mg and 300 mg doses in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria.Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The licensed dose for omalizumab within Europe for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is 300 mg every 4 weeks, and is based on the most effective dose identified in clinical trials. However, many patients require longer-term treatment with omalizumab and there is limited guidance on how to manage these patients. We report on a large cohort of 357 patients with CSU who have been treated over a 10-year period on a personalized dosing regimen. Our results showed a 4% reduction in drug cost for this personalized dosing regimen compared with having all patients on the standard regimen of omalizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks. In addition, by increasing the dose, we were able to treat 22% of patients more effectively, using the principle aim of zero CSU symptoms; prior to this regimen, these patients had been achieving only partial response. Omalizumab doses and frequency should be adjusted depending on clinical response to allow for improved benefits for both patients and healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.