Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35775819›Full record

ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2022

Combining intramuscular and intranasal homologous prime-boost with a chimpanzee adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccine elicits potent humoral and cellular immune responses in mice.

Xingxing Li, Ling Wang, Jingjing Liu, Enyue Fang, Xiaohui Liu, Qinhua Peng, Zelun Zhang, Miao Li, Xinyu Liu, Xiaohong Wu and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xingxing LiDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Ling WangState Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Jingjing LiuDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Enyue FangDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaohui LiuDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Qinhua PengDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zelun ZhangDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Miao LiDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xinyu LiuDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaohong WuDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Danhua ZhaoDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Lihong YangDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jia LiDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Shouchun CaoDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yanqiu HuangDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Leitai ShiDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hongshan XuDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yunpeng WangDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yue SuoDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Guangzhi YueDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jianhui NieDepartment of HIV/AIDS and Sex-transmitted Virus Vaccines, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Weijin HuangDepartment of HIV/AIDS and Sex-transmitted Virus Vaccines, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-4246-8889
Wenjuan LiDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yuhua LiDepartment of Arboviral Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
National Institutes for Food and Drug Control · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of many coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines has been shown to decrease to varying extents against new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants, which are responsible for the continuing COVID-19 pandemic. Combining intramuscular and intranasal vaccination routes is a promising approach for achieving more potent immune responses. We evaluated the immunogenicity of prime-boost protocols with a chimpanzee adenovirus serotype 68 vector-based vaccine, ChAdTS-S, administered via both intranasal and intramuscular routes in BALB/c mice. Intramuscular priming followed by an intranasal booster elicited the highest levels of IgG, IgA, and pseudovirus neutralizing antibody titres among all the protocols tested at day 42 after prime immunization compared with the intranasal priming/intramuscular booster and prime-boost protocols using only one route. In addition, intramuscular priming followed by an intranasal booster induced high T-cell responses, measured using the IFN-γ ELISpot assay, that were similar to those observed upon intramuscular vaccination. All ChAdTS-S vaccination groups induced Th1-skewing of the T-cell response according to intracellular cytokine staining and Meso Scale Discovery cytokine profiling assays on day 56 after priming. This study provides reference data for assessing vaccination schemes of adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccines with high immune efficacy.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdenoviridaeAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCytokinesImmunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralImmunization, SecondaryMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPan troglodytesSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesCytokinesAdenovirus-vectored vaccineChAdTS-SintramuscularintranasalSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35775819
PMCPMC9331206
OpenAlexW4283758282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.