ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2022
Cardiovascular Disease, Intensive Care, and Mortality in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients: A Meta-Analysis.
Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on the Management and Outcomes of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCoronavirus disease 2019 is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has imparted an extraordinary burden on the intensive care services, which is likely to echo in pandemic and critical care management glob- ally. We aim to meta-analyze mortality outcomes in cardiovascular disease patients and groups receiving corticosteroids therapy, intensive care admission status during coronavirus disease 2019 hospitalization and groups receiving corticosteroid therapy, and lastly, mortality outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients. Finally, we collate a coronavirus disease 2019 field algorithm for ST-elevation myocardial infarction critical care.
methodsPubMed databases were searched for relevant observational studies with MeSH terms including, "cardiovascular disease," "COVID-19," "intensive care," "mortality," and "mechanical ventilation." A random-effect model was used to calculate the risk ratio, using RevMan V5.3.
resultsA total of 67 622 patients were included with 10 076 participants in the cardiovascular disease group. Overall, the mean age of the participants in the studies was 60 ± 1.6 years and 52.1% were female. A higher death risk was found in cardiovascular disease patients during and after coronavirus disease 2019 infection (risk ratio = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.74 to 3.41, P < .0001). Mechanical ventilation was likened to worsen mortality rates at any time during the hospital stay (risk ratio = 5.32, 95% CI = 3.89 to 7.29, P < .0001). Publication bias was not observed and high methodological qualities were included.
conclusionsCardiovascular disease imparts a high burden on intensive care leading to high mortality among coronavirus disease 2019 patients. It is essential that myocardial infarctions in the acute care setting, and conditions such as hypertension and coronary artery diseases, are closely monitored while leading coronavirus disease 2019 hospitalization protocols.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.