Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35775788›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2022

Motor overflow in the lower limb after stroke: Insights into mechanisms.

Brice T Cleland, Sangeetha Madhavan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brice T ClelandBrain Plasticity Lab, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8227-6876
Sangeetha MadhavanBrain Plasticity Lab, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6086-0027

Funding

Cortical priming to optimize gait rehabilitation post strokeR01HD075777 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MADHAVAN, SANGEETHA · 2014 to 2024
$4.1M
Contribution of the non-lesioned hemisphere to lower limb movement and walking function after strokeF32HD102214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CLELAND, BRICE THOMAS · 2020 to 2022
$206k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD102214NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor overflow (involuntary muscle activation) is common after stroke, particularly in the non-paretic upper limb. Two potential cortical mechanisms are as follows: (1) The contralesional hemisphere controls both limbs, and (2) inhibition from the ipsilesional to the contralesional hemisphere is diminished. Few studies have differentiated between these hypotheses or investigated motor overflow in the lower limb after stroke. To investigate these potential mechanisms, individuals with chronic stroke performed unilateral isometric and dynamic dorsiflexion. Motor overflow was quantified in the contralateral, resting (non-target) ankle. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied, and responses were measured in both legs. Relations between motor overflow, excitability of ipsilateral motor pathways, and interhemispheric inhibition were assessed. Non-target muscle activity (motor overflow) was greater during isometric and dynamic conditions than rest in both legs (p ≤ 0.001) and was higher in the non-paretic than the paretic leg (p = 0.03). Some participants (25%) had motor overflow >4SD above the group mean in the non-paretic leg. Greater motor overflow in the non-paretic leg was associated with lesser inhibition from the ipsilesional to the contralesional hemisphere (p = 0.04). In both legs, non-target TMS responses were greater during the isometric and dynamic than the rest condition (p ≤ 0.01) but not when normalized to background muscle activity. Overall, motor overflow occurred in both legs after stroke, suggesting a common bilateral mechanism. Our correlational results suggest that alterations in interhemispheric inhibition may contribute to motor overflow. Furthermore, the lack of differences in non-target motor evoked potentials MEPs between rest, isometric, and dynamic conditions suggests that subcortical and/or spinal pathways may contribute to motor overflow.

Indexed as

Motor CortexStrokeStroke RehabilitationEvoked Potentials, MotorFunctional LateralityHumansLower ExtremityTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationelectromyographylower extremitymotor activitystroketranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35775788
PMCPMC9380181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.