ArticleJournal of periodontal & implant science2022
Evaluation of failed implants and reimplantation at sites of previous dental implant failure: survival rates and risk factors.
Article in Journal of periodontal & implant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-task survival modeling of dependent failure and reimplantation events in dental implants.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Materials Used in Coating Dental Implant Surfaces: State of the Art and Future Prospectives.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Risk factors and outcomes of consecutive dental implant replacements at failed sites: a retrospective cohort study.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Association between lncRNA H19 and osteoporosis in postmenopausal patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Factors Affecting Dental Implant Failure: A Retrospective Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Correlation between newly formed bone and the progression of experimental peri-implantitis with or without alveolar ridge preservation in infected and non-infected teeth: a secondary analysis of a preclinical study.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2025Article
- Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of a bone-level, 2-piece, internal connection implant system with coronal microthreads over 10 years of follow-up: a retrospective clinical study.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2025Article
- Dental Implant Survival Rates: Comprehensive Insights from a Large-Scale Electronic Dental Registry.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Current understanding of the etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and management of peri-implant diseases: a narrative review for the consensus report of the Korean Academy of Periodontology.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2024Review
- Treatment strategies for dental implant removal: A literature review.The Japanese dental science review · 2024Review
- Comprehensive treatment protocol for peri-implantitis: an up-to date narrative review of the literature.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2024Review
- Deep learning to assess bone quality from panoramic radiographs: the feasibility of clinical application through comparison with an implant surgeon and cone-beam computed tomography.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2024Article
- Impact of oral antithrombotic agents on urinary continence recovery following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study.BMC urology · 2024Article
- Risk Factors for Early Implant Failure and Selection of Bone Grafting Materials for Various Bone Augmentation Procedures: A Narrative Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Clinical evaluation of 3.0-mm narrow-diameter implants: a retrospective study with up to 5 years of observation.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate failed implants and reimplantation survival and to identify the relative risk factors for implant re-failure.
methodsNinety-one dental implants were extracted between 2006 and 2020 at the National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, including 56 implants in the maxilla and 35 implants in the mandible that were removed from 77 patients. Patient information (e.g., age, sex, and systemic diseases) and surgical information (e.g., the date of surgery and location of the implants and bone grafts) were recorded. If an implant prosthesis was used, prosthesis information was also recorded.
resultsIn total, 91 first-time failed dental implants in 77 patients were analyzed. Of them, 69 implants in 61 patients received reimplantation after failure. Sixteen patients (22 implants) refused reimplantation or received reimplantation at a different site. Eight of the 69 reimplants failed again. The 1-year survival rate of the 69 reimplants was 89.4%. Age at reimplantation and smoking significantly increased the risk of reimplantation failure. However, a history of taking anti-thrombotic agents showed a statistically significant negative association with reimplantation failure. Of the failed implants, 66% showed early failure and 34% showed late failure of the initial implantation. All 8 re-failed implants showed early failure. Only 3 of these 8 failed reimplants were re-tried and the second reimplants all survived.
conclusionsThe total survival rate of implants, which included reimplants and second reimplants was 99.2%, although the survival rate of the initial implantations was 96.3%. Previous failure did not affect the success of the next trial. Reimplantation failure was more strongly affected by patient factors than by implant factors. Therefore, each patient's specific factors need to be meticulously controlled to achieve successful reimplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.