Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35775680›Full record

ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2022

Laboratory markers used in the prediction of perforation in acute appendicitis.

Mehmet Patmano, Durmuş Ali Çetin, Tufan Gümüş

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Pro-adrenomedullin: a novel diagnostic biomarker of acute appendicitis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehmet PatmanoDepartment of General Surgery, Şanlıurfa Training and Research Hospital, Şanlıurfa-Türkiye.
Durmuş Ali ÇetinDepartment of General Surgery, Şanlıurfa Training and Research Hospital, Şanlıurfa-Türkiye.
Tufan GümüşDepartment of General Surgery, Şanlıurfa Training and Research Hospital, Şanlıurfa-Türkiye.
Education Training And Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study, we aimed to evaluate the laboratory markers used in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) and present the parameters that can be used to predict acute perforated appendicitis.

methodsThe cases who underwent an appendectomy in our clinic between September 2018 and March 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 530 patients who met the study criteria were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of an intraoperative perforation. Non-complicated appendicitis patients formed Group-1, and perforated appendicitis patients formed Group-2. The demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of the patients were compared.

resultsThe number of non-complicated patients in Group 1 was 443, while there were 87 (16.4%) patients in Group 2 who had perforated appendicitis. The mean age of the patients in the normal appendicitis group was 29.90±10.51 years, and the mean age of the patients in the perforated appendicitis group was 36.32±14.58 years. In the normal appendicitis group, 257 (58%) of the patients were male, 186 (42%) were female, while in the perforated appendicitis group, 38 (43.7%) were male, 49 (56.3%) were female. In the perfo-rated appendicitis group, white blood cell (WBC) value was 16.19±4.71 (p<0.001), C-reactive protein (CRP) value was 146.28±113.59 (p<0.001), total bilirubin value was 0.71±0.36 (p<0.001), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was 10.85±6.25 (p<0.001).

conclusionWe believe that the WBC, total bilirubin, CRP, and NLR values obtained within this study, which is tested in the rapid and easily accessible blood tests in routine examinations that can contribute to the prediction of perforation.

Indexed as

AppendicitisAcute DiseaseAdultBilirubinBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansLeukocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBilirubinBiomarkersC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID35775680
PMCPMC10493830
OpenAlexW3147283492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.