Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35775664›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2022

Self-reported factors for improving patient's dental care: A pilot study.

Taina Kankaala, Pirjo Kaakinen, Vuokko Anttonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Self-reported factors for improving patient's dental care: A pilot study.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taina KankaalaResearch Unit of Population Health, Department of Cariology, Endodontology and Paediatric Dentistry, University of Oulu, 90014, Univeristy of Oulu, Finland.
Pirjo KaakinenResearch Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Vuokko AnttonenResearch Unit of Population Health, Department of Cariology, Endodontology and Paediatric Dentistry, University of Oulu, 90014, Univeristy of Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3804-1858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatient-centered approach can offer valuable information in improving dental care, but literature is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate self-reported factors beneficial for attendance in dental care. MATERIAL AND

methodsSurvey data were collected during the summer of 2020 comprising both structured questionnaires and an open question on factors considered beneficial for dental attendance. Voluntary patients over 15 years of age (n = 196, 98%) agreed to fill the questionnaires, and n = 112 of them (57%) also gave open commentary in an urgent dental care clinic, City of Oulu, Finland, comprising the study population. Dental fear was assessed by Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) sum scores (min 5, max 25). All utterances (n = 181) on an open question were evaluated by inductive content analysis to create sub- and main categories. Covid-19 pandemic case counts in Finland were low at the time of the survey, but their effect on seeking dental care was asked. The distribution of patients was evaluated by cross-tabulation, considering their age, gender, and dental fear status; the significance level was p < .05.

resultsFemales dominated slightly the study population (57%). The mean age of the respondents was 44 years. Half (50%) had moderate (MDAS score 10-18), and 10% had severe dental fear (≥19). The open responses could be categorized into four main categories. The largest main category by patient count concerned factors related to personnel (29%), followed by the patient (28%) and treatment (25%) related, and administrative factors (19%). Males chose factors falling into categories of administration and treatment while females chose patient and personnel-related factors (p = .048). Compared to the rest, fearful persons (MDAS > 9) reported more often factors related to personnel and treatment (p = .03). Of all participants, 17% reported seeking less dental care during the pandemic.

conclusionsPatients value dental personnel and treatment-related factors, specifically those with fear.

Indexed as

COVID-19Dental AnxietyDental CareAdultFemaleFinlandHumansMalePandemicsPilot ProjectsSelf ReportSex Factorsdental attendancedental fearinductive content analysispandemic

Identifiers

PMID35775664
PMCPMC9562830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.