ArticleJournal of sleep research2022
Prevalence of exposure to benzodiazepines among pregnant women in Taiwan: A nationwide longitudinal study.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translating Evidence into Obstetric Care: Developing a Best Practice-Informed Stepped-Care Clinical Algorithm for the Management of Gestational Insomnia.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
- Use of benzodiazepine receptor agonists in different pregnancy trimesters and risk of maternal and neonatal outcomes: a propensity weighted cohort study in Taiwan.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Prevalence of exposure to benzodiazepines among pregnant women in Taiwan: A nationwide longitudinal study.Journal of sleep research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although more than one hundred studies have examined the prevalence of the use of benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine-like Z-hypnotics (BZDs) among pregnancy events, further analysis of the effects of dosage or type of BZDs is needed. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence rate of BZDs use in pregnancy events, stratified by trimester over time, with characteristics of the dosage and type of BZDs. This is a retrospective population study based on linking three national databases. We examined the prevalence rates from 2004 to 2017, and contrasted the results based on >0 defined daily dose (DDD) and ≥0.5 DDD. We identified 2,630,944 pregnancy events with live births; 89,897 (3.4%) of the associated pregnancy events had used some form of BZD during pregnancy. The prevalence of BZDs use, as defined by >0 DDD, decreased from 4.1% in 2004 to 2.9% in 2017, indicating a decrease in sporadic use and an increase in stable use within therapeutic doses. Meanwhile, BZDs use defined by ≥0.5 DDD increased from 0.1% in 2004 to 0.4% in 2017. Zolpidem was the most frequently prescribed BZDs, as defined by >0 DDD or ≥0.5 DDD. This national cohort study demonstrates the importance of average dosage in the definition of BZDs use in pregnancy events, and it found opposite trends in the prevalence of use between different dosages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.