Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35775138›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced nursing2022

Understanding how general practice nurses support adult lifestyle risk reduction: An integrative review.

Maksi Morris, Elizabeth Halcomb, Yazdan Mansourian, Maree Bernoth

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maksi MorrisSchool of Nursing, Paramedicine and Healthcare Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-6814
Elizabeth HalcombSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine & Health, University of Wollongong, Illawarra Health & Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8099-986X
Yazdan MansourianSchool of Information and Communication Studies, Faculty of Arts and Education, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0130-5741
Maree BernothSchool of Nursing, Paramedicine and Healthcare Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1788-2674
Charles Sturt University · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program - Department of Education and Training
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo review the literature exploring how general practice nurses support lifestyle risk reduction.

designIntegrative literature review. SOURCES: CINAHL, Emcare, MEDLINE, Proquest and Scopus were searched for peer-reviewed primary research published in English from 2010 to 2022.

methodsSixteen papers met the inclusion criteria and were assessed for methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were extracted and thematically analysed.

resultsFour themes described general practice nurses: (1) Establishing relational connections; (2) Empowering active participation; (3) Engaging mutual motivation and (4) Enabling confident action. General practice nurses used complex interpersonal, risk communication and health coaching skills to build collaborative partnerships that supported patients' self-determination and self-efficacy. While mutual motivation and confidence were reciprocally enabling, gaps in skills, experience and knowledge plus time, resource and role constraints limited general practice nurses' ability to support lifestyle risk reduction.

conclusionGeneral practice nurses play a key role in lifestyle risk reduction. Ongoing education, funding, organizational and professional support are needed to enhance their commitment, confidence and capacity. IMPACT: What problem did the study address? While general practice nurses play a key role in health promotion and risk reduction, their potential is yet to be fully realized. Research examining methods by which nurses working in general practice support lifestyle risk reduction is limited. What were the main findings? Successful interactions depended on personal, professional, organisational and systemic factors which either enhanced or inhibited relational quality, shared decision-making, mutual commitment, and nurses' confidence and capacity to address lifestyle risks. Targeted professional development and peer mentoring are needed to build proficient practice. Where and on whom will the research have impact? Understanding how general practice nurses support risk reduction can inform policy and identify training and support needs to advance their skills and role. Research exploring synergies between themes may illuminate this process.

Indexed as

General PracticeAdultCommunicationHealth PersonnelHumansRisk Reduction Behaviorbehaviour modificationgeneral practicehealth promotionintegrative reviewlifestyle changenursingoffice nursingpreventionprimary carerisk reduction

Identifiers

PMID35775138
PMCPMC9796034
OpenAlexW4283751097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.