Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35775124›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Experiences of COVID-19-Recovered Healthcare Workers in a Tertiary Hospital in the Philippines: A Mixed-Method Inquiry.

Mark B Carascal, Pedro E Capistrano, Marlouie D L Figueras, Osmuniard Lanz Angelo C Cataylo, Spencer Mathew S Zuñiga, Marc Eric S Reyes, Kathleen Kaye S Medriano, Anthony T Gamo, Paz D Mendoza, Shirley Luz B Macalipay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Impact of Post-COVID-19 Condition on Frontline Healthcare Workers: A Scoping Review.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mark B CarascalClinical and Translational Research Institute, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-8414-644X
Pedro E CapistranoRelations and Product Management, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines.
Marlouie D L FiguerasSt. Luke's College of Nursing, Trinity University of Asia, Quezon City, Philippines.
Osmuniard Lanz Angelo C CatayloHuman Capital Management Group, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines.
Spencer Mathew S ZuñigaHuman Capital Management Group, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines.
Marc Eric S ReyesCollege of Science, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-5280-1315
Kathleen Kaye S MedrianoInstitute of Mathematics, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Philippines.
Anthony T GamoHuman Capital Management Group, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines.
Paz D MendozaHuman Capital Management Group, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines.
Shirley Luz B MacalipayHuman Capital Management Group, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines.
University of Asia and the Pacific · PHUniversity of the Philippines Diliman · PHTrinity University of Asia · PHUniversity of Santo Tomas · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 pandemic affected the mental health of the global population. Among the most vulnerable are the healthcare workers (HCWs) who got infected but returned to the frontline after recovery. Currently, there is a dearth of information and understanding on the psychological status and actual lived experience of the recovered HCWs in the Philippines. The present study investigated the psychological status and experiences of 93 COVID-19-recovered HCWs from a tertiary hospital in the Philippines using a mixed-method approach, particularly the explanatory-sequential design. Participants completed the Impact of Event Scale-Revised, and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 in the quantitative phase. Selected participants took part in focus group discussions in the qualitative phase. Integrated results showed that our participants experienced significant COVID-19-related distress (mean IES-R score = 25.5; partial impact), anxiety (mean subscale score = 7.4; mild), and depression (mean subscale score = 8.1; mild). Certain sociodemographic and professional characteristics and the length of quarantine days appear to affect the psychometric scores. The quantitative results are supported by the participant's description of recovery experiences as living in uncertainty, distress, fatigue, dissociation, and valuation of life. In summary, adequate psychological support and intervention program should be prioritized and provided by hospital management for recovered HCWs to prevent the development of more serious mental health concerns that may significantly affect their tasks in caring for patients and in-hospital management.

Indexed as

COVID-19DepressionHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsPhilippinesSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesTertiary Care CentersanxietyCOVID-19depressionhealthcare workerlived experience

Identifiers

PMID35775124
PMCPMC9251963
OpenAlexW4283775723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.