ReviewDrugs in context2022
Diabetes: the role of continuous glucose monitoring.
Review in Drugs in context, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring on maternal and neonatal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Prevalence, duration, and clinical implications of continuous glucose monitor measurement limit capping in type 1 diabetes.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Article
- AI-driven personalization of food systems: From precision nutrition to climate-resilient supply chains.NPJ science of food · 2026Review
- Impact of isCGM on quality of life in overweight individuals with impaired glucose tolerance or mild diabetes: secondary analysis of a pilot randomized controlled study.Diabetology international · 2025Article
- Expanding the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Impact on Glycemic Control and Metabolic Health.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- A Pilot Study Examining If the Additional Use of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring Is Helpful for Glucose Control in Older Adults.Yonsei medical journal · 2025Article
- The Effect of Nutrition Education on Glycemic Outcomes in People With Type 1 Diabetes Initiating the Use of Glucose Sensors.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2025Observational
- Artificial intelligence in diabetes care: from predictive analytics to generative AI and implementation challenges.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Glycemic Control Assessed by Intermittently Scanned Glucose Monitoring in Type 1 Diabetes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Austria.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is a chronic condition affecting 1 out of every 11 people worldwide. Monitoring of blood glucose allows for therapeutic lifestyle and pharmacotherapy changes to reduce the occurrence of hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia. Advancements in technology over the past two decades have increased patient and clinician access to glucose data and trends with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems. This narrative review seeks to investigate the efficacy and safety of CGM for the management of diabetes. In type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes, efficacy studies of real-time CGM (rtCGM) or intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) have shown a decrease in HbA1C (0.3-0.6%) over traditional self-monitoring blood glucose. Percent time in the target glucose range also improved (6.8-17.6%). Rates of hypoglycaemia, including severe hypoglycaemia, decreased in studies of rtCGM and isCGM with most available data in T1DM. In pregnant women with T1DM, rtCGM has shown modest improvements in HbA1C and time in target glucose range and decreased risk of neonatal complications. Multiple studies have shown that the use of rtCGM or isCGM increased diabetes treatment satisfaction amongst patients. Head-to-head studies of rtCGM and isCGM are limited but one study indicates that a CGM system with alarms may be preferred in T1DM to reduce the risk of hypoglycaemia. Selection of a CGM device should depend on patient-specific factors and insurance coverage. The results of one study show that the benefits of CGM device use were not sustained after discontinuing use. Increasing widespread and long-term access to CGM devices is necessary to improve the management of diabetes amongst the greater population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.