Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35775066›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2022

The effect of pre-analytical variables on downstream application and data analysis of human endometrial biopsies.

A Maclean, M Adishesh, L Button, L Richards, R Alnafakh, E Newton, J Drury, D K Hapangama

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A MacleanDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5713-6959
M AdisheshDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
L ButtonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
L RichardsDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
R AlnafakhDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
E NewtonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
J DruryDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
D K HapangamaDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0270-0150
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V007238/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWhat are the effects of pre-analytical variables on the downstream analysis of patient-derived endometrial biopsies? SUMMARY ANSWER: There are distinct differences in the protein levels of the master regulator of oxygen homeostasis, hypoxia-inducible factor-1-alpha (HIF1α), and the protein and mRNA levels of three related genes, carbonic anhydrase 9 ( WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Patient-derived biopsies are vital to endometrial research, but pre-analytical variables relating to their collection may affect downstream analysis, as is evident in other tissues. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: A prospective observational study including patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometrial cancer (EC) or benign indications was conducted at a large tertiary gynaecological unit in the UK. Endometrial biopsies were obtained at different time points (pre- or post-hysterectomy) using either a pipelle endometrial sampler or as a full-thickness wedge biopsy. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsThe changes in HIF1α, CA9, VEGFA and PR protein levels were measured by semi-quantitative analysis of immunostaining, and the expression levels of three genes ( MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: An increase in HIF1α immunostaining was observed in EC versus benign endometrium (functionalis glands) obtained pre-hysterectomy ( LARGE SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: This descriptive study explores the effect of pre-analytical variables on the expression of four proteins and three hypoxia-related genes in a limited number of endometrial biopsies from patients with EC and benign controls. Due to the small number, it was not possible to investigate other potential variables such as menstrual cycle phase, region-specific differences within the endometrium, grade and stage of cancer, and surgical technicalities. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsCareful consideration of the effects of these pre-analytical variables is essential when interpreting data relating to human endometrial biopsies. A standardized approach to endometrial tissue collection is essential to ensure accurate and clinically transferrable data. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The work included in this manuscript was funded by Wellbeing of Women project grants RG1073 and RG2137 (D.K.H.), Wellbeing of Women Entry-Level Scholarship ELS706 and Medical Research Council MR/V007238/1 (A.M./D.K.H.), Liverpool Women's Hospital Cancer Charity (M.A.) and University of Liverpool (L.B., L.R. and E.N.).

Indexed as

endometrial biopsyendometrial cancerHIF1αhypoxiapre-analytical variables

Identifiers

PMID35775066
PMCPMC9240853
OpenAlexW4282831391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.