Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35775053›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Radiomics Features on Computed Tomography Combined With Clinical-Radiological Factors Predicting Progressive Hemorrhage of Cerebral Contusion.

Qingning Yang, Jun Sun, Yi Guo, Ping Zeng, Ke Jin, Chencui Huang, Jingxu Xu, Liran Hou, Chuanming Li, Junbang Feng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qingning YangDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Jun SunDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Yi GuoDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Ping ZengDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Ke JinDepartment of Research Collaboration, R&D Center, Beijing Deepwise & League of PHD Technology Co., Beijing, China.
Chencui HuangDepartment of Research Collaboration, R&D Center, Beijing Deepwise & League of PHD Technology Co., Beijing, China.
Jingxu XuDepartment of Research Collaboration, R&D Center, Beijing Deepwise & League of PHD Technology Co., Beijing, China.
Liran HouDepartment of Radiology, Panjiang Central Hospital, Guizhou, China.
Chuanming LiDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Junbang FengDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Center for High Pressure Science & Technology Advanced Research · CNChongqing Emergency Medical Center · CNChongqing University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the main cause of death and severe disability in young adults worldwide. Progressive hemorrhage (PH) worsens the disease and can cause a poor neurological prognosis. Radiomics analysis has been used for hematoma expansion of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. This study attempts to develop an optimal radiomics model based on non-contrast CT to predict PH by machine learning (ML) methods and compare its prediction performance with clinical-radiological models. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 165 TBI patients, including 89 patients with PH and 76 patients without PH, whose data were randomized into a training set and a testing set at a ratio of 7:3. A total of 10 different machine learning methods were used to predict PH. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were implemented to screen clinical-radiological factors and to establish a clinical-radiological model. Then, a combined model combining clinical-radiological factors with the radiomics score was constructed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy and F1 score, sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the models. Results: Among the 10 various ML algorithms, the support vector machine (SVM) had the best prediction performance based on 12 radiomics features, including the AUC (training set: 0.918; testing set: 0.879) and accuracy (training set: 0.872; test set: 0.834). Among the clinical and radiological factors, the onset-to-baseline CT time, the scalp hematoma, and fibrinogen were associated with PH. The radiomics model's prediction performance was better than the clinical-radiological model, while the predictive nomogram combining the radiomics features with clinical-radiological characteristics performed best. Conclusions: The radiomics model outperformed the traditional clinical-radiological model in predicting PH. The nomogram model of the combined radiomics features and clinical-radiological factors is a helpful tool for PH.

Indexed as

machine learningnomogramprogressive hemorrhageradiomicstraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID35775053
PMCPMC9237337
OpenAlexW4282840943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.