Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35774807›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

A Reliable Method to Recognize Soybean Seed Maturation Stages Based on Autofluorescence-Spectral Imaging Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms.

Thiago Barbosa Batista, Clíssia Barboza Mastrangelo, André Dantas de Medeiros, Ana Carolina Picinini Petronilio, Gustavo Roberto Fonseca de Oliveira, Isabela Lopes Dos Santos, Carlos Alexandre Costa Crusciol, Edvaldo Aparecido Amaral da Silva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thiago Barbosa BatistaDepartment of Crop Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Clíssia Barboza MastrangeloLaboratory of Radiobiology and Environment, Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
André Dantas de MedeirosDepartment of Agronomy, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Picinini PetronilioDepartment of Crop Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Gustavo Roberto Fonseca de OliveiraDepartment of Crop Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Isabela Lopes Dos SantosDepartment of Crop Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Carlos Alexandre Costa CrusciolDepartment of Crop Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Edvaldo Aparecido Amaral da SilvaDepartment of Crop Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Viçosa · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, technological innovations have allowed significant advances in the diagnosis of seed quality. Seeds with superior physiological quality are those with the highest level of physiological maturity and the integration of rapid and precise methods to separate them contributes to better performance in the field. Autofluorescence-spectral imaging is an innovative technique based on fluorescence signals from fluorophores present in seed tissues, which have biological implications for seed quality. Thus, through this technique, it would be possible to classify seeds in different maturation stages. To test this, we produced plants of a commercial cultivar (MG/BR 46 "Conquista") and collected the seeds at five reproductive (R) stages: R7.1 (beginning of maturity), R7.2 (mass maturity), R7.3 (seed disconnected from the mother plant), R8 (harvest point), and R9 (final maturity). Autofluorescence signals were extracted from images captured at different excitation/emission combinations. In parallel, we investigated physical parameters, germination, vigor and the dynamics of pigments in seeds from different maturation stages. To verify the accuracy in predicting the seed maturation stages based on autofluorescence-spectral imaging, we created machine learning models based on three algorithms: (i) random forest, (ii) neural network, and (iii) support vector machine. Here, we reported the unprecedented use of the autofluorescence-spectral technique to classify the maturation stages of soybean seeds, especially using the excitation/emission combination of chlorophyll

Indexed as

chlorophyll fluorescenceGlycine maxseed maturityseed qualitysupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID35774807
PMCPMC9237540
OpenAlexW4282842207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.