Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35774691›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Incidence Trends and Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Systematic Review of Population-Based Studies.

Joya-Rita Hindy, Juan A Quintero-Martinez, Alexander T Lee, Christopher G Scott, Danielle J Gerberi, Maryam Mahmood, Daniel C DeSimone, Larry M Baddour

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ceftriaxone for methicillin-susceptibleAnnals of medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Treatment of Methicillin-ResistantMedicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Clinical Predictors ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. ACS infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joya-Rita HindyInfectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Juan A Quintero-MartinezInfectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Alexander T LeeQuantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Christopher G ScottQuantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Danielle J GerberiLibrary, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Maryam MahmoodInfectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Daniel C DeSimoneInfectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Larry M BaddourInfectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine incidence trends of

methodsA contemporary systematic review was conducted using Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1991+), Ovid Embase (1974+), Ovid Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) (1946+ including epub ahead of print, in-process & other non-indexed citations), and Web of Science Core Collection (Science Citation Index Expanded 1975+ and Emerging Sources Citation Index 2015+). Two authors (J.R.H. and J.A.Q.M.) independently reviewed all studies and included those that reported population-based incidence of SAB in patients aged 18 years and older.

resultsTwenty-six studies met inclusion criteria with the highest number (n=6) of studies conducted in Canada. The incidence of SAB ranged from 9.3 to 65 cases/100,000/year. The median age of patients with SAB ranged from 62 to 72 years and SAB cases were more commonly observed in men than in women. The most common infection sources were intravascular catheters and skin and soft tissue infections. SAB incidence trends demonstrated high variability for geographic regions and calendar years. Overall, there was no change in the incidence trend across all studies during the past two decades.

conclusionMultiple factors, both pros, and cons are likely responsible for the overall stable SAB incidence in countries included in this systematic review. Some of these factors vary in geographic location and prompt additional investigations from countries not included in the current review so that a more global characterization is defined.

Indexed as

bacteremiaincidencepopulation-based studystaphylococcus aureustrends

Identifiers

PMID35774691
PMCPMC9239286
OpenAlexW4281672245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.