Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35774537›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2022

Assessment of Biodiversity in Food Consumption Studies: A Systematic Review.

Maria Fernanda Araújo de Medeiros, Stephanie Gomes Bezerra Silva, Carla Djaine Teixeira, Severina Carla Vieira Cunha Lima, Dirce Maria Marchioni, Michelle Cristine Medeiros Jacob

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nutraceutical Potential ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Fernanda Araújo de MedeirosNutrition Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Stephanie Gomes Bezerra SilvaNutrition Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Carla Djaine TeixeiraGraduate Program in Social Sciences, Center for Human Sciences, Letters and Arts, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Severina Carla Vieira Cunha LimaNutrition Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Dirce Maria MarchioniNutrition Department, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Michelle Cristine Medeiros JacobNutrition Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of food biodiversity has gained importance in nutrition due to the positive association between the diversity of foods consumed and the quality of diets. To date, however, we do not know systematically how food consumption studies address food biodiversity. Our objective with this paper was to characterize how food consumption studies address biodiverse foods, both in terms of (i) new methods capable of overcoming the limitations of existing methods, and (ii) indicators capable of measuring the contribution of biodiversity to nutrition. We conducted a systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), using four databases: Web of Science, Medline/PubMed (

Indexed as

ethnonutritionfood biodiversityfood consumptionfood securitysustainable development goals

Identifiers

PMID35774537
PMCPMC9237621
OpenAlexW4282925372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.