ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022
Biomolecular Prospecting, Informative Gaps, and the Cancer Clinic: A Qualitative Fieldwork and an Epistemological, Historical and Ethical Analysis of Informed Consent for Clinical Trials for Monoclonal Antibodies and Biobank Research.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
What happens to patients with cancer engaged in biomedical research when intellectual property regimes and ethical regimes intersect? This qualitative historical study addresses this question by situating the experiences, hopes, and reasons of patients to enter clinical trials within the historical trajectory of informed consent and monoclonal antibodies, the biotechnology underpinning many targeted drugs used in oncological clinical trials and biobank research. Based on fieldwork we undertook in a German university hospital where we interviewed patients and the medical personnel, a historical review, and an ethical analysis we inquire into the effects that financial, legal, and technological changes connected to the relevant pharmaceutical research and commerce have on cancer patients engaged in clinical trials and biobank research. We find that the controversial aspects of monoclonal antibodies, especially those related to the commercial interests at stake, enter the informed consent process mainly in the form of informative gaps. We highlight how a qualitative analysis of the clinic, especially when it is situated against the backdrop of the history of related technological advancements and patent regime, it can serve the purpose of giving voice to subjects who are silenced by regimes of an ethical, epistemic, and commercial kind while pointing to informed consent as an unhelpful device for addressing risks arising from the commercial purposes of biomedical products and infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.